Prostate cancer decisions — 2011
366 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's prostate cancer residuals are more consistent with a 60 percent disability evaluation, warranting a higher rating than what was previously assigned.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's SMC was reduced from the housebound rate to the 'K' rate for loss of use of a creative organ. The Board has determined that additional development is necessary due to the reduction in his disability rating and need for an examination to determine if he needs regular aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's claim for prostate cancer, claimed as due to herbicide exposure in service, is being remanded for further development. The RO/AMC will attempt to verify if the Veteran set foot in Vietnam during his service and obtain any additional personnel records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's prostate cancer residuals and erectile dysfunction are being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection for cervical spine disc disease and prostate cancer due to herbicide exposure, as well as his claim for an increased rating for lumbar pain, are being remanded for additional development.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's prostate cancer residuals are currently rated as 10 percent disabling. The claim for erectile dysfunction is pending and will be addressed in a separate rating decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer, which he claims is related to herbicide exposure, has been remanded due to the need for additional development of his treatment records and VA logs.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's death was not due to a service-connected disability rated 100% disabling for at least eight years prior to his death, thus denying enhanced DIC under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1311(a)(2).
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · February 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer, which was based on presumed exposure to Agent Orange during his military service in Vietnam, has been granted. However, the effective date of this grant is July 25, 2005, as it is not earlier than that date.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Board found that the severance decisions for service connection were improper due to lack of evidence showing actual exposure to herbicides in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's prostate cancer, status-post prostatectomy is rated at 40 percent since August 13, 2008. The condition was previously granted service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's prostate cancer and urethral discharge were not incurred or aggravated by his military service.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn by the appellant before a decision was made.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's prostate cancer and major depression have been rated appropriately, with no new evidence of increased disability. The TDIU claim is also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's prostate cancer was not incurred in or aggravated by active duty service, to include as a result of exposure to an herbicide agent or ionizing radiation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Board has remanded the case for further development regarding whether Parkinson's disease and prostate cancer contributed to the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus, finding no evidence of herbicide exposure in service or a causal link to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and there is no evidence of herbicide exposure. As such, the claim for DIC benefits due to service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's prostate cancer was not incurred in service and there is no evidence of herbicide exposure. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · February 2011
The Veteran's prostate cancer is being reviewed for service connection, with a focus on whether it was caused by herbicide exposure during his service in Thailand. The VA will seek additional evidence and conduct further examination to determine if the Veteran has been exposed to herbicides and if so, whether he developed prostate cancer as a result.
← Back to Prostate cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.