Prostate cancer decisions — 2012
368 indexed Board decisions in 2012.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD is considered a contributory cause of his death, with the VA physician finding that it was at least as likely as not (50 percent or more probable) that the Veteran's PTSD contributed to his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's prostate cancer was not incurred in or aggravated by service, and there is no evidence of herbicide exposure. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2012
The Veteran is over 65 years old, had more than 90 days of active service during the Vietnam era, and has a combined disability rating of over 60 percent for pension purposes. Therefore, he meets the criteria for special monthly pension at the rate set out under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1521(e).
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Board found that the service-connected prostate cancer did not cause or contribute to the Veteran's death, and thus denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection and special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ were denied as there is no evidence that the conditions existed prior to October 22, 2009.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's prostate cancer and cardiorespiratory disorder were not service-connected, as there was no evidence linking these conditions to his military service. The cause of death, cardiorespiratory failure due to pneumonia with metastatic prostate cancer, was attributed to non-service-related causes.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant, and no jurisdiction remains for the merits of the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The cause of the Veteran's death was not incurred in or aggravated by active service, as there is no evidence linking his prostate cancer to exposure during military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer, which he claims is due to chemical exposure during the Persian Gulf War, has been remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals. The case will be returned to the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office (RO) for further development and consideration.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2012
The Board finds that the Veteran's service-connected prostatitis caused or aggravated his current prostate cancer, and grants service connection for prostate cancer as due to service-connected prostatitis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Veteran's prostate cancer is being remanded for further examination and analysis due to the lack of evidence linking it to his service, specifically Vietnam-era exposure. The case will be reviewed again after additional development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Veteran is seeking service connection for prostate cancer, which he claims is due to exposure to Agent Orange while stationed in Thailand. The VA has not verified his claimed herbicide exposure and needs to take further steps as per VA Fast Letter 09-20.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2012
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining service treatment records and identifying dates of active duty or training periods. The appellant's claim will be reconsidered based on the additional evidence.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2012
The Veteran requested to reopen his claim for service connection for prostate cancer, including due to exposure to Agent Orange. New evidence was submitted but the Board found that it did not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim and thus did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for residuals of a radical prostatectomy, concluding that his symptoms did not warrant a higher evaluation based on voiding dysfunction or renal dysfunction.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD was granted with a 100% rating effective January 23, 2007. Service connection was also established for hypertension and diabetes mellitus on the same date.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's residuals of prostate cancer did not meet or more nearly approximate the criteria for a higher initial rating in excess of 20 percent under Diagnostic Code 7528, and thus denied his claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2012
The Board found that the reduction of the evaluation for residuals of prostate cancer from 100 percent to 40 percent was proper, effective June 1, 2009.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2012
The Board has determined that the reduction of the disability rating from 100% to 10% for residuals of prostate cancer status-post prostatectomy with erectile dysfunction was proper. The Veteran's condition improved, warranting a lower rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2012
The Veteran's prostate cancer is not found to be related to service, including exposure to ionizing radiation.
← Back to Prostate cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.