Prostate cancer decisions — 2013
390 indexed Board decisions in 2013.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2013
The Board denied service connection for prostate cancer, finding no evidence of herbicide exposure and insufficient medical evidence to link the condition to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2013
The Veteran's prostate cancer, status post radical retropubic prostatectomy, has not presented an exceptional or unusual disability picture so as to render application of the rating schedule impractical. The criteria for referral for consideration of an extra-schedular evaluation in excess of 60 percent have not been met.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2013
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining a dose estimate of any possible radiation exposure during service and preparing an advisory medical opinion regarding whether such exposure caused or contributed to prostate cancer.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2013
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn, and the claims for service connection have been dismissed.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2013
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for prostate cancer due to exposure to ionizing radiation. The Veteran was exposed to ionizing radiation during Operation CASTLE in 1954, and his prostate cancer is related to this exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2013
The Veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer was denied as the evidence did not show that he had prostate cancer due to his military service, including exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2013
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine if the Veteran was exposed to herbicides in Okinawa, Japan and whether his prostate cancer led to his rectal cancer. The appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of her husband's death will be remanded.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJuly 2013
The Veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection for prostate cancer has been denied due to the lack of new and material evidence. The Board found that the additional evidence submitted does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2013
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus, and erectile dysfunction, rendered him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment prior to November 17, 2010.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2013
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded due to the need for a more complete examination of his service-connected disabilities and their impact on employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · July 2013
The Veteran's prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus, type II are presumed to be related to herbicide exposure during service at Eglin Air Force Base.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · July 2013
The Veteran's service connection claim for prostate cancer, claimed as due to herbicide exposure in service, is granted based on the presumption of exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2013
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining more complete service records and providing VA medical opinions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2013
The Board has ordered a remand to obtain an examination and opinion regarding the Veteran's low back disability, specifically whether it is secondary to his service-connected prostate cancer.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2013
The Veteran seeks service connection for a prostate disability, including secondary to inservice herbicide exposure. The case is being remanded for additional development and consideration of the claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2013
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU is being remanded due to the need for additional VA examinations and records review. The issue will be reconsidered after these steps are completed.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2013
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including PTSD, coronary artery disease, prostate cancer, peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, and hypothyroidism, all secondary to exposure to ionizing radiation. The evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2013
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed chronic prostatitis and prostate cancer were not incurred or aggravated during service, and as such, denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2013
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral hand eczema, claimed as a skin condition, was restored to an initial 30 percent disability rating. The appeal for prostate cancer service connection is pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2013
The Veteran's claim for TDIU is being remanded due to changes in his disability picture and the need for additional examination.
← Back to Prostate cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.