Prostate cancer decisions — 2020
1,445 indexed Board decisions in 2020.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · April 2020
The Veteran's prostate cancer is granted as service connected due to exposure in the Republic of Vietnam, with a minimum rating of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to the need to obtain SSA records and review the Veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient nexus opinions regarding the Veteran's prostate cancer, which is presumed to be related to contaminated water exposure at Camp Lejeune. The VA needs to obtain a new opinion on this issue.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2020
The Veteran's prostate cancer residuals resulting in voiding dysfunction that required him to change absorbent materials more than four times per day from August 9, 2011 to January 27, 2014 is granted at a rating of 60 percent. After this period, the rating is no higher than 40 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2020
The Board has found that there was not substantial compliance with the previous remand directives regarding the Veteran's claims for prostate cancer and a heart disability. Therefore, another remand is required to further develop these issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2020
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for heart disease, prostate cancer with frequent urination, erectile dysfunction due to prostate cancer, and depression. The decision is based on the Veteran's exposure to herbicides during service within the 12 nautical mile territorial sea of Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2020
The Veteran withdrew his claim for service connection for prostate cancer, and the Board dismissed it.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for gallbladder cancer, prostate cancer, and bladder cancer due to exposure to ionizing radiation. The evidence did not support a link between these cancers and active service.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2020
The Veteran's prostate cancer is presumed to have been incurred in service due to herbicide agent exposure, and the Board has granted this claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for prostate cancer, bladder disorder, erectile dysfunction, and scars due to potential service connection based on radiation exposure. Additional development is needed including obtaining a dose estimate of ionizing radiation exposure during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2020
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus, type II due to potential exposure to herbicide agents during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2020
The Board denied service connection for a left knee disability, diabetes mellitus, and prostate cancer. The Board found that the preponderance of evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were related to service or herbicide exposure.,Service connection was denied because there is no medical evidence linking any current diagnoses to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2020
The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is rated at a compensable level of 20 percent.,The reduction in evaluation from 100% to 40% for prostate cancer residuals was upheld, effective November 1, 2015.,The Veteran’s voiding dysfunction with urinary frequency and nocturia does not warrant a rating higher than 40%. The symptoms do not result in leakage or the need for an appliance.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for prostate cancer and right eye disability due to radiation exposure. The prostate cancer claim requires an addendum opinion, while the right eye disability claim needs a new examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2020
The Board has dismissed the issue of service connection for prostate cancer. The issues of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2020
The Veteran's prostate cancer is granted service connection and a rating of 20 percent for his right great toe exostosis, with no higher. The decision also grants the Veteran's claim to reopen on new evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date than July 8, 2015, for a 100 percent rating for prostatic intraepithelial neoplasis (prostate cancer), finding that the evidence did not reach equipoise in favor of granting such a retroactive rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2020
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for hypertension, prostate cancer, and erectile dysfunction due to potential exposure to herbicides during service in Vietnam. The Veteran's presence aboard USS Agerholm while on the gun line is being verified, and an opinion regarding whether his current conditions are related to military service will be provided.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2020
The Board has granted service connection for a vestibular disability, but the issues of service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, glaucoma, bilateral lower extremity disability, and prostate cancer remain remanded due to lack of verification of herbicide agent exposure.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2020
The Veteran's appeal for an initial compensable rating for erectile dysfunction has been withdrawn. The Board has also remanded the issues of entitlement to higher ratings for PTSD and residuals of prostate cancer.
← Back to Prostate cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.