Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,110 vetted Board decisions for Prostate cancer.
The Veteran's initial increased ratings for his service-connected conditions have been denied.,No effective date has been assigned as the claims are still pending.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus type II, and hypertension as they are not related to his active service or exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.
The Veteran's prostate and bladder cancers are being remanded for a VA examination to determine if they are due to exposure to Trichloroethylene (TCE) during service.
The Board finds that the Veteran was exposed to herbicides, including Agent Orange, while stationed in Vietnam and therefore service connection is granted for his cause of death due to diabetes and metastatic prostate cancer.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining private medical records and an examination to assess his ability to work due to his service-connected disabilities.
The Board found that the Veteran's current back disability was not incurred in or aggravated by service and denied his claim. The prostate cancer claim is addressed in the REMAND portion of this decision.
The Board found that the Veteran's prostate cancer is in remission and does not warrant a reduction of his disability rating. For the period after November 1, 2013, the Veteran was granted a compensable rating for service-connected prostate cancer.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for coronary artery disease, prostate cancer, hypertension, residuals of left broken collar bone, and left hip scarring. The evidence did not establish that these conditions were incurred or aggravated by active service, including exposure to herbicides.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's prostate cancer is related to his service at Camp Lejeune, and thus grants service connection for prostate cancer. The issue of testicular cancer remains pending as it was not addressed in this decision.
The Veteran's prostate cancer is being reviewed for service connection, with a presumption of exposure to herbicides. The VA has not yet verified the Veteran's claimed exposure in Thailand, Japan and Guam.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a new VA examination to evaluate his service-connected residuals of prostate cancer with robotic prostatectomy, including erectile dysfunction and bladder infections. The claim will be readjudicated after the examination.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to secure and follow substantially gainful employment, warranting a TDIU.
The Veteran's prostate cancer and lung cancer are granted service connection based on presumed exposure to herbicides. His erectile dysfunction is secondary to his service-connected prostate cancer, and his brain cancer is secondary to his service-connected lung cancer.
The Board found that the Veteran did not have exposure to herbicides in Vietnam or Thailand, and thus could not establish service connection for prostate cancer as secondary to such exposure.
The Board has remanded the case for further development to assess the Veteran's employability due to his service-connected disabilities, including PTSD and prostate cancer.
The Veteran's prostate cancer is not service connected as it did not develop during his active duty or within one year of separation. The Board finds that the evidence does not support a presumption of herbicide exposure in Vietnam, and there is no direct evidence linking the condition to service.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities are so severe that they preclude him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment, warranting a TDIU.
The Veteran's combined disability rating meets the schedular criteria for a TDIU due to his service-connected disabilities, which include PTSD, prostate cancer, and tinnitus. The preponderance of evidence shows that these conditions are of such severity as to prevent him from engaging in substantially gainful employment.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining updated treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the severity of his prostate cancer disability. The TDIU claim is also inextricably intertwined with this issue.
The Veteran's renal cancer, prostate cancer, and erectile dysfunction were not shown to be related to service or any service-connected disability. The claims are denied.
← Back to Prostate cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.