Acquired psychiatric disorder decisions — 2000
1,467 indexed Board decisions in 2000.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The VA determined that the veteran's psychiatric disability, bipolar disorder with history of schizophrenic reaction, is currently evaluated at a 30 percent rating and does not warrant an increased evaluation.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2000
The veteran's claims of service connection for a psychiatric disorder and hypertension are granted. The initial rating for the scar from a left inguinal hernia repair is assigned as 0 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's current psychiatric disability, classified as a depressive disorder, is related to his active service and has granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedOctober 2000
The Board has reopened the veteran's claims for service connection for a heart disorder, psychiatric disorder, and skin disorder. However, it denied these claims on their merits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2000
The veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for his service-connected schizophrenia is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a rating in excess of 70 percent for his service-connected schizophrenia and entitlement to TDIU, finding that the evidence did not support an increased disability rating or a finding of unemployability due to his service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board found no evidence of a current psychiatric disorder related to service and denied the veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD and pension benefits due to his nonservice-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board found that the appellant's schizophrenia pre-existed his period of active duty for training and did not increase in disability during service. Therefore, it was determined that the appellant's schizophrenia was not aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hearing loss, a psychiatric disorder to include PTSD, and a compensable evaluation for pseudofolliculitis barbae. The claim for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for left knee strain with chondromalacia was also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2000
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, other than PTSD. The veteran's PTSD is found to be incurred during active military service. Service connection is granted for impotency as secondary to hypertension, a back disability, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and sleep apnea.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation was granted on January 31, 1996 with a 100% disability rating effective from that date. The Board found it not factually ascertainable that the veteran was entitled to earlier effective dates.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied service connection for schizophrenia, concluding the claim was not well-grounded due to lack of competent medical evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied reopening the claim for service connection due to lack of new and material evidence, despite additional medical records indicating a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2000
The Board found that the veteran's psychiatric disorder is not well grounded, as there is no evidence linking it to service.,The veteran's erectile dysfunction claim was found to be well grounded. The VA examiner opined that his current erectile dysfunction is multifactorial and related to spinal cord injury, mumps orchitis, schizophrenia, and medications for schizophrenia.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board found that the veteran's claim for service connection for a mental disorder as secondary to his service-connected residuals of head trauma is not well grounded. The claims for increased ratings for chondromalacia of the left and right knees were denied due to lack of evidence showing that the disabilities are related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for service connection for schizophrenia is well-grounded, but his claim for service connection for an eye disorder (claimed as allergic conjunctivitis) is not well-grounded.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2000
The Board dismissed the motion for CUE regarding the April 1998 decision on attorney fee agreements due to lack of a clear and unmistakable error (CUE) claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2000
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining VA hospitalization records and adjudicating a recently submitted claim for pension.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied the claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, finding that there was no evidence linking the condition to the appellant's period of active duty for training (ACDUTRA). The preponderance of the evidence indicated a long history of mental health issues prior to and after her military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim. The case is being remanded for further development.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.