Acquired psychiatric disorder decisions — 2000
1,467 indexed Board decisions in 2000.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied the veteran's request to reopen his claim of service connection for schizophrenia, concluding that new and material evidence had not been submitted. The decision was based on the evidence of record showing no diagnosis of schizophrenia during or within one year after service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection of a chronic acquired psychiatric disorder due to new and material evidence being submitted. However, the claim remains well grounded as it is not supported by cognizable evidence showing that the claim is plausible or capable of substantiation.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been presented to reopen the veteran's claim of service connection for a psychiatric disorder, and finds that his claim is well grounded based on the submitted medical opinions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2000
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a Board hearing at the RO.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board found that the veteran's schizophrenia preexisted service and was not aggravated by service, thus denying his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder was first diagnosed in service and has continued after service. The Board granted the claim, finding that the veteran developed a psychosis in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for service connection for schizophrenia is well grounded. However, the claims for service connection for back, left hand and eye disabilities are not well grounded and are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, a low back disorder, and jungle rot, as well as an increased rating for postoperative residuals of a tear of the left lateral meniscus and partial tear of the left quadriceps muscle. The decision also reopened one or more claims on the basis of new evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2000
The Board has determined that the appellant has not submitted new and material evidence to reopen his claims for service connection for a back disorder and an acquired psychiatric disorder. The case is being remanded for further action.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The Board granted an increased disability rating for the veteran's cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral muscular pain. The attorney fees from past-due benefits are eligible based on this decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied service connection for low back and psychiatric disorders as secondary to the service-connected gunshot wound of the right foot.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a grant of service connection for PTSD, finding that the effective date cannot be earlier than December 29, 1989, as this is when the Phoenix RO received the veteran's original claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board found that the evidence did not provide a nexus between the veteran's current psychiatric disorder and service, thus denying the claim for service connection. The increased rating claim for rheumatoid arthritis was also denied as there was no significant evidence of active rheumatoid arthritis.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been presented to reopen the claim for service connection of a psychiatric disorder, specifically schizophrenia. The Board also found that it is likely as not that the current diagnosis of schizophrenia in 1971 was an outgrowth or maturation of symptoms from 1971.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2000
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development due to the need for a Statement of the Case on issues related to service connection on an Agent Orange basis.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied the appellant's claim to reopen his service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claim of service connection for a psychiatric disorder. The reduction from a 60 percent evaluation to a 30 percent evaluation for mitral valve prolapse with status post-operative cardiac pacemaker insertion was not proper.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMay 2000
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for schizophrenia. The issue of an increased evaluation for a scar of the forehead remains denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 50 percent for his service-connected schizophrenic reaction prior to October 3, 1997 was denied. The current rating criteria were applied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder, to include PTSD, was not incurred in or aggravated by service and denied his claim.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.