Acquired psychiatric disorder decisions — 2002
919 indexed Board decisions in 2002.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2002
The Board found that the appellant's mental illness caused a prolonged deviation from his normal method of behavior and so departed from the accepted standards of the community to which he belonged, allowing him to receive VA benefits despite his other than honorable discharge. The veteran's paranoid schizophrenia was incurred during active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board denied the veteran's request to reopen his claim of service connection for a psychiatric disorder, finding that no new and material evidence had been presented.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection and total rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disability, both of which were reopened with new evidence that was not in the file at the time of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The veteran's claim for reimbursement or payment of medical expenses incurred during his inpatient hospital stay at a non-VA facility was denied as he had not sufficiently stabilized to be transferred to a VA medical facility by February 26, 1999.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board has determined that the veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, was not incurred in or aggravated by active duty service and cannot be presumed to have been so incurred. The claim is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, specifically paranoid schizophrenia, and also denied the propriety of a noncompensable evaluation for residuals of a gunshot wound injury to the right hand. The veteran's claims were not supported by evidence showing a direct link between his military service and these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board found that the appellant's need for regular aid and attendance of another person, as well as his being housebound due to disabilities, does not meet the criteria established by VA regulations.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2002
The Board has granted the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of a back injury, postoperative residuals from hemorrhoidectomy, and gastrointestinal signs and symptoms (including bloody stools) due to an undiagnosed illness resulting from Persian Gulf service. Service connection was not established for neuropsychiatric signs and symptoms.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2002
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder. The veteran's wife provided additional information suggesting a possible link between his mental health issues and service, which was not previously considered.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board has determined that the veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred or aggravated by service, as there is no evidence of such conditions within one year of discharge. The psychiatric disability was also not incurred in service. As a result, these claims are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board denied the veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection of a psychiatric disorder, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board denied the reopening of a claim for service connection for a psychiatric disorder, finding that new and material evidence was not presented to support the claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2002
The Board has determined that the veteran's preexisting psychoneurosis was aggravated by his wartime service, and thus granted service connection for the psychiatric disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2002
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for a psychiatric disorder and granted an effective date of January 24, 1997 for his total and permanent disability pension rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on loss of use of both hands and legs due to a lack of clinical evidence reasonably suggestive of 'loss of use' of the legs as defined by VA regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2002
The Board found no causal relationship between the veteran's military service and his current psychiatric disorder, leading to a denial of his claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2002
The Board has found that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claim of service connection for schizophrenia, which was previously denied in August 1982. The decision will now proceed on the merits.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMay 2002
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for paranoid schizophrenia, which was previously denied in October 1996. The veteran's condition is currently being treated with ongoing treatment for paranoid schizophrenia.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2002
The veteran's claim for a permanent and total disability rating for non-service connected pension purposes is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling examinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2002
The Board has determined that the appellant's headaches, acquired psychiatric disorder, and a disorder manifested by memory problems are all related to his military service. Service connection is granted for these conditions.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.