Acquired psychiatric disorder decisions — 2004
1,376 indexed Board decisions in 2004.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection of a chronic acquired psychiatric disorder, finding that new and material evidence has been submitted. The veteran's major depression is found to be proximately due to his service-connected CTS, S/P transposition of the right ulnar nerve.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board found that new and material evidence had been received to reopen the claim, but denied service connection for a psychiatric disorder as there was no competent medical evidence demonstrating a link between the veteran's current condition and his military service.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJune 2004
The Board found that new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen the claim, but denied service connection for a psychiatric disorder including a psychosis due to lack of evidence showing its onset in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a diagnosed PTSD, and there is insufficient evidence to establish service connection for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The claims are therefore denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board found that the veteran's hypertension is not due to disease or injury incurred in service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral pes planus, a sleep disorder, and musculoskeletal disabilities of his lower extremities. The appeals for reopening claims regarding headache disorder, low back disability, and psychiatric disability (PTSD) were also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board found that the veteran's claimed acquired psychiatric disability was not incurred in or aggravated by his military service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board has determined that the veteran did not submit new and material evidence to reopen his claim of entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, as the additional evidence does not establish a current psychiatric disorder incurred or aggravated during active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The veteran's claim for an effective date prior to January 14, 1997 for the grant of service connection for a psychiatric disorder was denied. The Board found that no earlier effective date could be granted as there were no records indicating treatment or diagnosis before this date.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claim of service connection for a neuropsychiatric disorder, finding that new and material evidence had not been received to reopen his previous denial in December 1986.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and a back disorder, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen these claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board has determined that the effective date for a 100% rating for service-connected schizophrenia, paranoid type, with PTSD should be June 6, 1984.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The VA determined that the veteran does not have a psychiatric disorder attributable to military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, other than PTSD. The claim is now reopened.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied the claimant's service connection for schizophrenia, paranoid type as it was not incurred in or aggravated by active duty for training.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining service medical records and arranging for VA examinations to determine the nature and likely etiology of any claimed psychiatric disorder and facial injury residuals.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records from the veteran's treatment at the Lyons VA Medical Center for the period from January 1993 to May 1995. The claim will be reconsidered and a supplemental statement of the case issued if necessary.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied reopening the claim for service connection for a psychiatric disorder due to lack of new and material evidence, as the additional evidence did not provide a nexus between the current psychiatric disorders and service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been presented to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection for psychiatric disability, including alcoholism. The claim is now considered on its merits.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied the applications to reopen previously denied claims of service connection for a psychiatric disorder, low back disorder, right and left knee disorders, cluster migraine headaches, and chronic fatigue. The evidence received since the previous decisions was not new and material.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.