Acquired psychiatric disorder decisions — 2011
1,957 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD. The evidence submitted did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2011
The Board has ordered additional development due to the Veteran's testimony indicating he received VA mental health treatment in 1973 and 1974, but no records were found. The claim is being remanded for further review after obtaining any available records.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's preexisting psychiatric disorder was aggravated by service, and therefore grants service connection for his current psychiatric condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied due to the lack of evidence establishing a link between her claimed conditions and active duty or any related periods of ACDUTRA or INACDUTRA.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral spine, and a skin disorder of the hands and feet have all been granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, was denied as there is no evidence of current PTSD or any other current psychiatric disability related to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2011
The Veteran's service connection claims for various conditions, including macules on the tongue, bronchitis, asthma, sinusitis, a heart murmur, hypertension (HTN), right and left carpal tunnel syndromes, bilateral pes planus, low back disability, residuals of salpingo-oophorectomy, and psychiatric disorders have been granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD based on personal assault, is being remanded due to the need for additional development and consideration of new evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2011
The Board has remanded the case for additional development to obtain updated VA medical records, clarify the Veteran's service connection claims, and provide a comprehensive examination to determine the nature and etiology of any cervical spine disability, migraine headaches, and acquired psychiatric disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's current psychiatric disorder was not present during service or within one year of discharge, and is not etiologically related to his active service. Therefore, service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2011
The Veteran's traumatic arthritis of the left knee is found to be service-connected due to a shrapnel wound. The issue of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder (to include PTSD and depression) has been withdrawn by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2011
The Board finds that the Veteran's PTSD was aggravated by her experiences on active service, meeting the criteria for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Veteran is found not competent to handle disbursement of VA benefits funds.,There is no evidence showing the Veteran needs regular aid and attendance or being housebound due to his service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD based on personal assault. The evidence did not support a current diagnosis of PTSD or any other psychiatric condition and there was no credible evidence linking these conditions to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2011
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA and Social Security Administration records, and addressing whether there was CUE in the August 2006 denial of compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2011
The Board is remanding the case for further development and adjudication, including scheduling a VA psychiatric compensation examination to consider continuity of symptomatology.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder was not present during his period of active military service, is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to his active service, and is not shown to have manifested to a degree of 10 percent or more within one year from the date of his military discharge. As such, the claim for service connection was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Board found no evidence of a current acquired psychiatric disorder, including posttraumatic stress disorder, related to service. The Veteran's claims for low back and rough skin disorders were also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Board found that the Veteran is not competent to manage her own funds due to delusional thinking and poor judgment caused by service-connected schizophrenia, leading to a decision denying her claim for direct receipt of VA compensation benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including bipolar disorder, is being remanded due to incomplete records and the need for a VA examination.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.