Acquired psychiatric disorder decisions — 2013
1,647 indexed Board decisions in 2013.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2013
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to inconsistencies in the diagnosis and stressor criteria.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2013
The Veteran's undifferentiated schizophrenia is currently rated at 50 percent, and his claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disability was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2013
The Board has determined that the Veteran's schizophrenia was not manifest in service or within one year of separation, and is unrelated to service. Therefore, service connection for schizophrenia is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2013
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate findings in a previous VA examination report. The Veteran needs to undergo a new VA psychiatric examination to determine if his acquired psychiatric disorder is related to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2013
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a psychiatric disability other than mood disorder (claimed as anxiety, depression, and stress), to include PTSD, is being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2013
The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorders, including PTSD, Anxiety Disorder with Panic Attacks, and Depression, are found to be related to pre-service events. The service-connected anxiety disorder is also found to have aggravated the Veteran's chemical dependency. As such, service connection for these conditions is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2013
The Board found that the Veteran does not have PTSD and there is no evidence of a psychosis manifested within one year after service. The medical evidence did not establish any psychiatric disorder, including depression, nicotine dependence, or alcohol dependence, as being causally related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2013
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not meet the DSM-IV criteria for a diagnosis of PTSD, and therefore service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2013
The Board has remanded the case for further development and adjudication due to issues related to service connection for headaches, a bilateral leg disorder, and an acquired psychiatric disorder. The Veteran's claim will be reviewed in accordance with Clemons v. Shinseki (2009) where claims encompass all psychiatric disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2013
The Board found that the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and is not related to service or any incident therein.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2013
The Veteran's service treatment records do not show any psychiatric disorders. His current depression and anxiety are attributed to his below-the-knee amputation due to combat injuries sustained during the Korean War.,His dementia of Alzheimer's Type is currently being treated, but there is no direct evidence linking it to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2013
The Board has granted service connection for pleural and sub-pleural lung scarring, finding that the Veteran's current respiratory disability is likely caused by his exposure to asbestos during service. The other issues remain pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2013
The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability, including PTSD, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and panic disorder with agoraphobia, is related to his active service.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2013
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for the issues of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, residuals of exposure to asbestos, and facet arthropathy at the level of the 5th lumbar vertebra and 1st sacral segment. As a result, these claims are dismissed.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2013
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for irritable colon syndrome and multiple chemical sensitivity have been withdrawn by the authorized representative. The claims of increased ratings for residuals of a right index finger disability, GERD, fibromyalgia, non-cardiac chest pain due to undiagnosed illness, rhinitis with sinusitis, skin disorder (including tinea cruris, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and psuedofolliculitis barbae), and onychomycosis of the toenails have been granted. The Veteran's claim for SMC based on need for aid and attendance remains pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2013
The Board found that the preponderance of evidence is against a finding that the Veteran currently suffers from PTSD or an acquired psychiatric disorder resulting from active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2013
The Veteran's mental disorder is not found to be related to his active service, and the claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2013
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining service personnel records and mental health records from both periods of active duty. A VA examination is also needed to determine the nature and etiology of any diagnosed psychiatric disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2013
The Board found that there is no credible supporting evidence of the Veteran's claimed in-service stressors, and thus, service connection for PTSD cannot be granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2013
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder due to the submission of new and material evidence, which raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.