Acquired psychiatric disorder decisions — 2017
2,417 indexed Board decisions in 2017.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2017
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records and providing VCAA notice to the Veteran.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorders, including PTSD, OCD, and bipolar disorder, are presumed to have existed prior to service. The Board also found no evidence of aggravation during service for these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2017
The Board has granted service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, to include schizophrenia, dyssomnia, anxiety disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) and psychotic disorder NOS. Service connection was denied for a back disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's psychiatric disorder, including anxiety and depression, is secondary to his service-connected IBS. The VA examiners provided opinions supporting this finding.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2017
The Veteran's claims for increased rating and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including updated VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2017
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a videoconference hearing at the RO. The issues include service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, service connection for a chronic kidney disability (secondary to a service-connected condition), and total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2017
The Board has granted service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, specifically bipolar disorder. The claim for a seizure disorder was denied as there is no diagnosed disability during the appeal period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2017
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining an addendum opinion from a VA psychiatrist regarding the etiology of the Veteran's diagnosed adjustment disorder and ADD.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2017
The Board found no evidence linking the Veteran's claimed psychiatric disorder to his period of service, and thus denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2017
The Board denied service connection for a psychiatric disorder, left gluteus SFW, and scar formation in the left gluteus due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to service.,Service connection was not granted as there is no credible evidence of an in-service injury or disease related to the Veteran's claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2017
The Veteran's claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, a rating in excess of 20 percent for duodenal ulcer disease with chronic duodenitis on an extraschedular basis, and TDIU were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a relationship between the Veteran's depression and his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2017
The Veteran's fibromyalgia claim is denied as it does not meet the criteria for service connection. The acquired psychiatric disorder (to include PTSD) claim is also denied because there is no confirmed inservice stressor and the diagnosed conditions are more likely related to substance abuse rather than service.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2017
The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability to include a depressive disorder is service connected as secondary to his service-connected low back disability. His right lower extremity lumbar radiculopathy associated with the low back disability has also been granted service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2017
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to an unsuccessful attempt to verify a period of Active Duty for Training (ACDUTRA) in February and March 1991. The claim will be reconsidered on a de novo basis.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2017
The Board has dismissed the appeal due to the Veteran's death, and no jurisdiction remains for the merits of the case.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's reports of in-service stressors were not credible and there was no evidence corroborating his alleged stressors. The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that a relationship exists between the Veteran's currently diagnosed acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD) and military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder did not begin during service and was not otherwise caused by his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2017
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for left ear hearing loss, cervical spine disability, a skin disorder of the face and chin, bilateral knee disability, and acquired psychiatric disorders. The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for eczema of the feet was also denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2017
The Veteran asserts that he has an acquired psychiatric disorder, which he describes as PTSD, resulting from his 1991 service in support of Operation Desert Storm. The Board finds the Veteran's combat service is conceded and remands for a new VA examination to determine if the Veteran has an acquired psychiatric disorder related to his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2017
The Veteran's appeal includes claims for various conditions and disorders, but the Board is remanding these cases due to procedural issues.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.