Acquired psychiatric disorder Board decisions
63,264 indexed Board decisions for Acquired psychiatric disorder.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board found that an effective date prior to January 17, 1992 for a grant of service connection and a 100 percent evaluation for schizophrenia is not warranted based on the evidence showing actual notice of the December 1964 RO decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The Board has remanded the case due to procedural issues and the need for additional development, including providing notice of VCAA rights and evidence from sources other than service records that may corroborate a veteran's account of physical assault incidents.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further examination and analysis due to conflicting medical opinions regarding the veteran's psychiatric disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and further development is required before a final decision can be made.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied the veteran's request for an earlier effective date of May 14, 1992 for his TDIU due to lack of evidence showing he was totally disabled by service-connected disabilities prior to that date.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board found that an acquired psychiatric disorder, specifically post-traumatic stress disorder, is related to the appellant's military service and granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied reopening the claims for service connection for various conditions, including headaches and tinnitus as residuals of a spinal tap, loss of visual acuity, psychiatric disorder, disability of the back and legs, and hearing loss. The evidence submitted was deemed insufficient to reopen these claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board has granted an increased rating to 50 percent for the veteran's psychiatric disorder, which previously had a 30 percent rating. The decision is based on the current level of impairment and does not involve service connection through a presumption or reopening due to new evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a 100 percent schedular rating for service-connected psychiatric disability prior to March 29, 1994 is being remanded due to the need for additional development and notification under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA).
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder including PTSD and a compensable initial rating for lymphogranuloma venereum with groin pain, condylomata, postoperative circumcision. The veteran's claim for total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities was also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board has determined that the veteran's acquired psychiatric disorders, including PTSD and schizophrenia, are related to his military service. The decision grants service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board has granted the veteran's claims for service connection for several conditions, including arthritis, anxiety disorder, peptic ulcer and gall bladder disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic sinus disability, chronic back disability, breast disorder, and eye disorder. The decision is based on direct evidence of a link between these conditions and military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further development and examination, including obtaining VA treatment records and conducting a psychiatric evaluation.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board has reopened the veteran's claims for service connection for a back disability and right leg and foot disability, as new and material evidence has been submitted. The psychiatric disability claim remains pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The veteran's claims for service connection have been denied. The RO found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen his previously denied gastrointestinal disability claim, and the denial of hepatitis was final.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The Board has remanded the case due to a significant change in the law regarding Veterans' Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA). The veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is being reviewed again, and additional evidence must be obtained.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased disability rating for bilateral hearing loss and service connection for a psychiatric nervous condition secondary to service-connected tinnitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected schizophrenia, paranoid type is being remanded due to the need for additional development including a VA psychiatric examination and compliance with VCAA requirements.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied the veteran's application to reopen his claim of entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric disorder, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2004
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claim of service connection for schizophrenia. The Board will now consider whether this condition is related to active service or within one year of discharge.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.