Acquired psychiatric disorder Board decisions
63,264 indexed Board decisions for Acquired psychiatric disorder.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2000
The Board dismissed the appeal because no Substantive Appeal was filed within 60 days of the issuance of the Statement of the Case or within the remainder of the one-year period following the date of notification of the determination being appealed.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The Board has determined that the appellant's current psychiatric disability is related to his active duty for training, and thus service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board found that the veteran's schizophrenia did not meet the criteria for an increased rating beyond 70 percent, as it did not result in total social and industrial inadaptability.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board found that the claim for service connection for schizophrenia was not well grounded, as there is no evidence of a pre-existing condition in service or post-service continuity of symptomatology.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The veteran's preexisting acquired psychiatric disability was not aggravated during his active military service, and therefore he is denied entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · May 2000
The Board found that the veteran's memory loss and psychiatric disability were not incurred in or aggravated by his active military service, nor are they related to a service-connected condition. The claims for service connection were denied.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMay 2000
The Board has determined that the evidence submitted since the last final denial in 1990 is not new and material, as it does not alter the factual situation presented at that time. The claim remains denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The veteran's claim for a clothing allowance is denied because he does not meet the eligibility criteria as there is no indication that he wears or uses prosthetic or orthopedic appliances due to a service-connected disability, nor does he use medication prescribed by a physician for a service-connected skin disorder causing irreparable damage to his outer garments.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2000
The veteran's claim is well-grounded as he has submitted evidence of current disability and competent medical evidence linking his psychiatric symptoms to service. However, the decision on whether service connection should be granted requires further development due to conflicting opinions regarding pre-existing conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The veteran's claim for service connection for paranoid schizophrenia as secondary to his service-connected removal of right testicle was granted effective March 30, 1995. The award of a total disability evaluation based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities was also granted effective March 30, 1995.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, including post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), finding that there is no evidence connecting any other psychiatric diagnoses to service and concluding that the veteran does not have PTSD attributable to military service or to any incident of active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for schizophrenia and an increased evaluation for hypertension. The claim for service connection was found to be not well grounded, while the claim for hypertension was granted a 10 percent rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board has determined that the submitted evidence is not new and material, thus denying the reopening of the claim for service connection for psychiatric disability.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2000
The veteran's application to reopen a previously denied claim of service connection for schizophrenia was dismissed because the appeal was not timely filed.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The Board has granted service connection for the veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder (depression), but denied claims of service connection for impotence, stomach disorder, tinnitus, and lumbar spine disorder. The rating for osteochondritis dissecans of the left knee is increased to 20 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder. The claim is well-grounded, but the evidence does not support a finding of service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of a head injury and an acquired psychiatric disorder, diagnosed as dysthymia. The claim for PTSD is pending due to insufficient information regarding the stressors.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is not well-grounded and therefore denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2000
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected schizophrenia is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records from the Social Security Administration and scheduling a VA psychiatric examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied reopening the veteran's claims for service connection for chronic paranoid schizophrenia and disorders of the right foot, finding no new and material evidence to support these claims.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.