Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
63,264 vetted Board decisions for Acquired psychiatric disorder.
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hip and ankle disabilities as they are already compensated by his service-connected radiculopathy. The issues of initial compensable rating for allergic rhinitis, service connection for neck disability, service connection for bilateral shoulder disability (secondary to neck disability), and service connection for bilateral knee disability have been REMANDED.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder has been reopened, and the Board finds new and material evidence to support this. The case is remanded for a VA examination to assess his diagnoses during the pendency of the appeal and determine their etiology. Additionally, the case is also remanded for an addendum medical opinion regarding the Veteran's use of topical medications for tinea pedis.
The Board has remanded the claim due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's psychiatric condition and its relationship to service. The Veteran's claims file does not reflect that there are any records from Gulf Coast Mental Health Center, which is relevant to this appeal.
The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability is granted, but not related to service.,The Veteran's lumbar spine and cervical spine disabilities are denied as not related to service.
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of PTSD and finds no evidence to support service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD. The evidence is against a finding that these conditions began during service or are otherwise related to service.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, a heart disability, and bilateral knee disability due to incomplete verification of his military service records and outstanding medical records.
The appeal is dismissed because the Veteran died during the pendency of the appeal.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a lumbar spine disability and psychiatric disorder, finding that there was no evidence of an in-service injury or disease related to these conditions.,The Veteran did not have a current diagnosis of PTSD as per VA regulations and criteria.
The Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea is not related to service or a service-connected condition.,Herpes was not diagnosed during service and no evidence supports its relation to service. ,Evidence received since the last final rating decision relates to an unestablished fact (migraine headaches) and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.,Evidence received since the last final rating decision relates to an unestablished fact (an acquired psychiatric disability) and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.,The Veteran's degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine does not meet criteria for an evaluation in excess of 20 percent.,For the entirety of the appeal period, radiculopathy of the right lower extremity meets criteria for a 10 percent evaluation from January 31, 2013 to January 22, 2016 and from February 28, 2017. It does not meet criteria for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent.,For the entirety of the appeal period, radiculopathy of the right lower extremity meets criteria for a 10 percent evaluation from January 31, 2013 to January 22, 2016 and from February 28, 2017. It does not meet criteria for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent.,For the entirety of the appeal period, radiculopathy of the left lower extremity meets criteria for a 20 percent evaluation from January 31, 2013 to January 22, 2016 and from February 28, 2017. It does not meet criteria for an evaluation in excess of 20 percent.
The Board has remanded the cases due to conflicting medical opinions and a need for further examination. The Veteran's mental health conditions, including PTSD, schizophrenia, and alcohol use disorder, are being reviewed.
The Board has remanded the case for a medical opinion to address whether the Veteran's preexisting schizoid personality disorder worsened during service, and if so, whether it is more likely than not related to service.
The Veteran's appeals for service connection and increased ratings are being reconsidered due to new relevant records. The TDIU claim is referred to the AOJ.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence and need for further medical opinions regarding the Veteran's bilateral knee disabilities, lung disability (pleural plaques), and acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD).
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD is currently rated at 50 percent, but he and his wife claim that the disability has worsened. The Board finds a need for a new examination to assess the current level of impairment.
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been reopened and are being remanded due to the submission of new and material evidence. The issues remain unresolved.
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder, diagnosed as chronic adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression. The decision is based on a finding that there is at least an even balance of evidence regarding whether this condition is related to active military service.
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a hiatal hernia due to medication, and remanded the cases of residuals of STD and an acquired psychiatric disorder (claimed as PTSD and depression).
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability and TDIU, finding that there was no evidence of a pre-service or in-service onset of these conditions.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence and need for further examination.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder was aggravated by his military service.
← Back to Acquired psychiatric disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.