PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) decisions — 2001
2,704 indexed Board decisions in 2001.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2001
The Board granted an effective date of May 15, 2001 for the grant of a 100 percent schedular rating for PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2001
The Board found that the veteran did not engage in combat with the enemy and credible supporting evidence of a stressor has not been presented. Therefore, service connection for PTSD was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2001
The veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his PTSD, papulopustular acne (claimed as chloracne), bilateral hearing loss, and subluxation of the temporomandibular joints with internal derangement of the right jaw joint were denied. The claim for a corneal abrasion of the left eye is referred to the RO.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD is related to his service in Vietnam, and thus grants service connection for PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2001
The veteran died due to a severe concussion resulting from a motor vehicle accident. The Board found that the cause of death was his own willful misconduct, as evidenced by his high blood alcohol content at the time of the accident.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2001
The Board has granted the veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), finding that new and material evidence supports reopening of her previously denied claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2001
The veteran's claims for increased ratings and a total disability rating based on individual unemployability were denied. The RO confirmed the existing combined rating of 90 percent for service-connected disabilities, which included bilateral hearing loss (rated at 60%), lumbosacral strain (rated at 40%), PTSD (rated at 30%), residuals of TUR of the bladder neck with benign prostatic hypertrophy (rated at 20%), and a cyst of the epiglottis (noncompensable).
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2001
The veteran's PTSD is manifested by symptoms including major depression, difficulty adapting to stressful environments, and problems with family and social relationships. The Board has determined that the disability picture more nearly approximates a 70 percent evaluation for PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2001
The Board of Veterans' Appeals denied the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD due to a lack of competent medical evidence diagnosing PTSD based on an in-service stressor.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2001
The Board found that the veteran did not file a timely notice of disagreement regarding the effective date of service connection for PTSD, and thus the March 1995 decision is final.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD warrants a 70 percent evaluation, reflecting significant occupational and social impairment.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2001
The veteran's PTSD is manifested by symptoms such as nightmares, intrusive thoughts, depression, anxiety, flashbacks, exaggerated startle response, isolation, and suicidal ideation. The Board has granted a 70 percent evaluation for the veteran's PTSD.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2001
The veteran's PTSD is manifested by symptoms such as avoidant behavior, irritability, nightmares, and difficulty with interpersonal relationships. The VA has granted a 30 percent evaluation for his PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2001
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for skin disability of the feet, pulmonary disability, and PTSD. The skin disability is not considered to be incurred in or aggravated by active duty, nor may it be presumed due to an undiagnosed illness. The pulmonary disability claim was denied as there is no evidence that the veteran engaged in combat with the enemy during service. The PTSD claim was also denied because the veteran failed to provide sufficient details about his alleged stressors and did not obtain corroborating evidence of his participation in combat or verified stressors.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2001
The RO denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a nervous condition in April 1958, which became final as he did not file an application for review within one year of notice of denial. The effective date for the award of service connection for PTSD is February 9, 1987.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2001
The Board has determined that the effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disability is March 5, 1996.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD warrants a 50 percent evaluation, reflecting significant occupational and social impairment.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2001
The Board found that the veteran's PTSD diagnosis was not credible due to her history of drug use and unstable personality, and thus denied service connection for PTSD.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2001
The veteran's low back disability is rated at 60 percent, effective June 2, 1992. The left little finger disability remains noncompensably disabling. Neurogenic bladder has been rated as 40 percent disabling since February 17, 1994. The residuals of in-service rib injury and head injury are each rated at 30 percent disabling. PTSD is rated at 30 percent disabling effective June 2, 1992. The veteran's bowel disability remains noncompensably disabling.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2001
The Board has determined that the effective date for a 100 percent disability rating for PTSD with dysthymic disorder should be November 20, 1987.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.