PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) decisions — 2019
13,112 indexed Board decisions in 2019.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2019
The Veteran's prostatitis rating was improperly reduced, and the right wrist disability is not rated higher. The diabetes mellitus rating remains unchanged, but a TDIU is granted as of June 26, 2012. All other issues are remanded for further review.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for higher ratings and earlier effective dates due to insufficient development of evidence. The Veteran's OSA, PTSD, and peripheral neuropathy are all being evaluated further.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
An effective date of April 18, 2016, but not earlier, for the award of a 70 percent rating for PTSD is granted. The Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea and headaches is also remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and opinions regarding his hearing loss, sleep apnea, hypertension, ulcerative colitis, anemia, acne and boils (skin condition), and acquired psychiatric disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of PTSD was denied. A rating of 70 percent, but no more, for PTSD is granted on and after November 19, 2015. The Veteran is also granted a TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for diabetes mellitus was withdrawn. The Board granted service connection for PTSD, finding that the Veteran met all three elements of the PTSD service connection criteria.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 30 percent prior to July 5, 2017 and in excess of 70 percent thereafter for service-connected PTSD and persistent depressive disorder due to a lack of VA examination. The case is being returned to the RO for further action.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2019
The Board dismissed the appeals for an initial rating in excess of 30 percent for PTSD prior to January 10, 2010, and entitlement to SMC based on housebound status from August 1, 2008, to January 7, 2010. The Veteran's appeal was withdrawn by his attorney representative.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The Veteran's hypertension, migraine headaches, PTSD and depressive disorder with pure dysthymic syndrome are all granted. The Veteran is awarded a 10 percent rating for his hypertension from June 9, 2017 to October 16, 2018. A 50 percent rating is granted for his migraine headaches during the same period. His PTSD and depressive disorder with pure dysthymic syndrome are rated at 50 percent throughout the appeal period. The Veteran's back disability, left knee condition, and TDIU claims are all remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability, including PTSD and depression, is granted. A 10% rating for pseudofolliculitis barbae is granted from August 27, 2013 to November 9, 2018.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted. The claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD (claimed as depression) is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2019
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence and a need for further examination. The Veteran's PTSD is currently service-connected, but there are issues regarding its etiology based on personal assault in service.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 70% since September 20, 2013. He also received a TDIU rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The Veteran's claims for gastritis, migraines, and PTSD have been granted with effective dates of February 10, 2014. She is also entitled to SMC at the housebound rate.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2019
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's psychiatric conditions and potential stressors. A new examination is needed to determine if the Veteran meets the diagnostic criteria for a psychiatric disorder at any point in the appeal period, including PTSD and major depressive disorder.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2019
The Veteran's TDIU claim was remanded due to the RO not complying with a previous Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) remand request for an examination. The case is now back before the BVA and will be adjudicated again after another examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The VA awarded the Appellant DIC benefits based on her spouse's service-connected disabilities, which were rated as totally disabling for at least 8 years prior to death. The decision is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The Veteran's PTSD warrants a 50 percent rating prior to July 27, 2010 and is denied for any higher ratings. The appeal for a rating greater than 50 percent after July 27, 2010 was not granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2019
The Veteran's PTSD resulted in significant impairment, but she is not found to be unemployable due to her service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of any acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD. The Veteran's service in Panama during his National Guard duty is considered as part of the stressor claim.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.