PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) Board decisions
168,868 indexed Board decisions for PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development, including obtaining additional treatment records and scheduling a VA psychiatric examination. The issue of entitlement to a total disability evaluation based on individual unemployability due to service connected disorders is also part of the appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Board has denied a higher evaluation for PTSD, and the case is being remanded to obtain additional medical records and to schedule a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2012
The Veteran's symptoms of PTSD have resulted in occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood. The claim for an initial disability rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD has been denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a personal hearing before the Board of Veterans' Appeals. The case will be returned to the RO after the hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorders were not incurred in or aggravated by his military service, including any alleged traumatic events during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Board has ordered additional development due to issues not previously addressed in a statement of the case, including whether there was clear and unmistakable error shown in the June 1972 and February 1973 rating decisions denying service connection for a psychiatric disorder, and whether the Veteran's appeal for service connection for a nervous condition has been open since November 1972. The Board also requested an additional VA medical opinion to determine if the Veteran satisfied the requirements for a diagnosis of PTSD as of April 11, 1980.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedOctober 2012
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been presented to reopen the claim of service connection for PTSD. The Veteran's statements regarding the onset of his PTSD are inconsistent, and there is no additional evidence provided since the last denial that relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Board has determined that additional development is needed before the case can be fully adjudicated, including obtaining updated medical records and a new VA examination to determine if service connection for PTSD should be granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection, increased ratings, and TDIU were denied. The Veteran was not granted service connection for squamous-cell carcinoma of the left foot due to lack of chronicity in service or continuity of symptoms post-service. Service connection for diabetes mellitus with hypertension and nephropathy, bilateral hearing loss, and PTSD were also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, thyroid disorder, and prostate cancer were denied. The claim for diabetes mellitus was not reopened due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorders, including PTSD, dysthymic disorder, major depression, and anxiety disorder, are related to his service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling VA examinations. The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and reopening of a claim are to be reconsidered.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2012
The Veteran's PTSD is found to be incurred in service and the claim for service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD and Anxiety Disorder was denied as there is no evidence of a diagnosed disability related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded to obtain updated VA treatment records and to schedule him for a VA examination to determine the etiology of his erectile dysfunction and any lower extremity peripheral neuropathy.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining court martial records of a drill instructor alleged to have sexually assaulted the Veteran during service. The Veteran's claim will be reconsidered based on this additional evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2012
The VA determined that the Veteran's PTSD does not warrant a rating higher than 30 percent, as it causes minimal impairment in social and occupational functioning.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records, a new VA examination for PTSD, and issuance of a statement of the case on the sleep apnea claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2012
The Veteran's PTSD with dysthymic disorder has been rated at 70 percent since November 14, 2011. The VA Appeals Management Center (AMC) increased the rating from 50 to 70 percent effective November 14, 2011.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2012
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA examination and failure to provide a new one. The Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea is being remanded for further development, including an adequate VA examination.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.