PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) Board decisions
168,868 indexed Board decisions for PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to fully and fairly consider the Veteran's claims, including obtaining in-service treatment records and VA/privately obtained medical records. The issues of service connection for a psychiatric disorder and skin disorder are being remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to outstanding VA treatment records and the need for a new examination. The claims will be reconsidered based on the additional evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's PTSD is characterized by occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity, warranting a 50 percent disability rating under Diagnostic Code 9411.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating in excess of 30 percent for a psychiatric disorder, to include PTSD, is being remanded due to the need for additional VA examinations and updated medical records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran seeks service connection for PTSD, alleging that he experienced stressful events in service. The Board has remanded the case due to recent guidance from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims regarding the evidentiary standard for establishing the required in-service stressor.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's PTSD warrants a 70 percent disability evaluation since June 24, 2008.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for PTSD is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including verification of stressors and a new VA psychiatric examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected PTSD is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining VA outpatient treatment records and scheduling a new VA psychiatric examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board has determined that the appellant's PTSD does not warrant a rating in excess of 70 percent, as his symptoms do not meet or approximate the criteria for a higher evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, to include PTSD, is being remanded due to the need for further development including verification of in-service stressors and obtaining VA and private medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for PTSD, concluding that there was not sufficient evidence to corroborate his claimed stressors and their relationship to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's appeal is remanded to the RO for further development of the evidence and due process development, including a new VA psychiatric examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Veteran was unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful employment due to his service-connected disabilities, at least for the period from December 4, 2007, to January 28, 2009.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · February 2011
The Veteran's PTSD is found to be service-connected due to a stressor during his active duty in the Southwest Asia Theater of Operations. The memory loss and insomnia are also considered as manifestations of an undiagnosed illness or chronic disability related to service. However, there is no evidence supporting a separate diagnosis for degenerative joint disease that can be attributed to an undiagnosed illness or other qualifying condition.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2011
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the Veteran's claims for service connection for depression, a sleep disorder, joint pain involving the knees and wrists, fatigue, headaches, neuropsychological symptoms, and PTSD. The evidence received since September 2002 does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate any of these claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's reported stressors, while involving racial tension in Germany, were not corroborated. Therefore, service connection for PTSD cannot be established. For his respiratory disorder, there is no evidence of a chronic disease or disability resulting from asbestos exposure during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current psychiatric disability, diagnosed as major depression or dysthymia, is related to service and has granted her claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board denied the appellant's claims for increased ratings and discontinuance of SMC based on loss of use of the right foot. The issues were related to PTSD, spinal stenosis with degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine, and radiculopathy.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric disorder, including PTSD. The case was remanded multiple times due to incomplete records and verification of stressors.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's claims for an initial rating in excess of 50 percent for PTSD, and service connection for headaches and a stomach condition were denied. The Veteran's PTSD was rated at 50 percent effective February 5, 2003.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.