Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
168,868 indexed Board decisions for PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).
The VA determined that the veteran's PTSD warranted a 30 percent disability rating, effective December 15, 2004. The symptoms described were not severe enough to warrant a higher rating.
The veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is being remanded due to the need to verify his claimed stressors and determine if he has a current diagnosis of PTSD related to those events.
The Board has determined that a VA examination is needed to assess whether the veteran's service-connected PTSD alone renders him unemployable. The case will be returned for further review.
The Board denied the veteran's request for an earlier effective date of December 31, 2003 for the grant of service connection for PTSD with depressive disorder. The decision stated that no evidence existed to support a retroactive award due to lack of eligibility criteria being met on April 11, 1980.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than February 1, 1996, for a 100 percent rating for his PTSD.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD and granted it, finding that new evidence supports a diagnosis of PTSD related to in-service stressors.
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD is service-connected due to events experienced during active duty in Vietnam.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a diagnosed PTSD based on an in-service stressor and therefore, service connection for PTSD is denied.
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to determine the validity of the veteran's claims for tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The RO must schedule examinations and obtain verification of claimed stressors before these issues can be adjudicated.
The veteran's claim for service disabled veterans insurance was denied because he did not file a timely application within the two-year period after his PTSD disability was granted. The veteran had been found competent throughout the relevant time frame.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and SSA disability benefits records. The veteran's claims will be readjudicated after these actions.
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional examinations and records, particularly regarding the veteran's shell fragment wound residuals and PTSD.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for PTSD, left ankle fracture residuals, shell fragment wound of the left leg, and bilateral hearing loss are being remanded due to insufficient notice provided and the need for additional VA examinations.
The Board found that there is no evidence of an in-service stressor sufficient to support a diagnosis of PTSD, and the veteran does not have PTSD as a result of military service.
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD and assigned an effective date of February 2, 2004.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim of service connection for PTSD due to new and material evidence. However, the claim is denied as there are no verified stressors and the currently diagnosed PTSD is not shown to be due to a disease or injury incurred in active service.
The Board has determined that an effective date earlier than January 26, 2006 for the grant of a 100 percent disability evaluation for PTSD is denied.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) due to new and material evidence submitted since the February 2003 rating decision.
The veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is being remanded due to the need for further development regarding his claimed stressors and exposure to combat.
The VA denied the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD as there was no verifiable in-service stressor to support his diagnosis.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.