Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
168,868 indexed Board decisions for PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for lumbar spine and left knee disabilities, but granted a 50 percent rating for PTSD effective July 7, 1997. The veteran was informed of these determinations.
The Board has reviewed the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including asbestosis (also claimed as COPD), PTSD, positive TB test, hypertension, degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine with lumbago and sciatica, scoliosis, and skin fungus. However, there is no competent medical evidence to support a finding that any of these conditions were incurred or aggravated by service.
The Board finds that the veteran is reasonably discharging his responsibility for C.M.'s support, and thus a general apportionment of benefits is not warranted. The appellant has been receiving limited income from her daughter's Social Security payments but does not have more than $932.67 in monthly expenses.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for PTSD. The veteran's claim for depression is considered a new claim as it had not previously been denied.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for his PTSD rating and TDIU award.
The veteran's initial ratings for diabetes mellitus, PTSD, cervical spine DJD, right shoulder DJD, and left shoulder DJD were denied.
The Board has reopened the claim and granted service connection for PTSD, finding that new evidence supports a diagnosis of PTSD related to in-service stressors.
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for updated treatment records and a VA examination of the veteran's PTSD.
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA psychiatric examination to determine if there is a link between the veteran's PTSD and in-service stressors.
The veteran's PTSD symptoms resulted in occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity, warranting a 50 percent evaluation.
The Board has granted service connection for adrenocortical carcinoma and assigned a 50% rating for PTSD, but denied reopening of the claim for adrenocortical carcinoma. The veteran's PTSD is currently rated at 70%.
The veteran's claims for PTSD and TDIU were granted effective March 1, 1999.,An earlier effective date is denied as the criteria are not met.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA medical records and conducting examinations to determine the current severity of the veteran's service-connected conditions.
The veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 30 percent for PTSD was granted, and the effective date for service connection remains April 17, 2001.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed PTSD is not related to his military service and denied the claim.
The Board has reopened the appellant's claim for service connection for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder due to new and material evidence provided by lay statements. The claim is granted as there is credible supporting evidence of a personal assault during active military service.
The veteran's PTSD symptoms resulted in mild to moderate social impairment, warranting a 30 percent evaluation from August 9, 2007. Prior to that date, the veteran was granted an initial 10 percent evaluation for his PTSD.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for PTSD and depression need further development due to incomplete information regarding in-service stressors, and a need for additional medical opinions.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD and an initial higher rating for bilateral hearing loss.
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional development and hearing.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.