Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
168,869 vetted Board decisions for PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).
The veteran's claim for a 100% evaluation for PTSD was denied, and the Board found that he is not entitled to retroactive compensation at $2,163 per month from January 28, 1988.
The veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD was denied, and his increased evaluation for residuals of a stab wound to the left chest with partial pneumothorax remains pending.
The veteran's appeals for service connection were withdrawn, and the Board dismissed his claims due to lack of evidence supporting the claimed conditions.
The Board has reopened the previously denied claim for service connection for PTSD based on new evidence, but denied the claim itself.,The appellant's current symptoms of PTSD are not etiologically related to his military service.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD due to a lack of credible supporting evidence that the claimed in-service stressors occurred, and because he did not engage in combat with the enemy.
The veteran's PTSD is rated at a 70 percent evaluation, the highest available under the criteria for mental disorders.
The veteran's appeal for service connection for PTSD, claimed as shell shock, has been dismissed due to the death of the veteran.
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD and assigned a 30 percent disability rating, effective January 16, 2004.
The Board has granted the veteran's claim to reopen his PTSD claim and remanded for further development of evidence related to the stressors claimed by the veteran.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for a video-conference hearing at the Lincoln, Nebraska RO. The case will be returned to the Board after this hearing.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including PTSD and a skin disability. The decision also addressed other issues such as diabetes mellitus, hearing loss, and sleep apnea.
The veteran's service-connected PTSD is rated at 70 percent effective December 21, 1998. This rating reflects significant occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a psychiatric disability to include PTSD, an initial rating in excess of 40 percent for type II diabetes mellitus, and a rating in excess of 10 percent for hepatomegaly. The veteran does not meet the criteria for these conditions based on his medical records and examinations.
The veteran's PTSD is found to be service-connected, and the VA has assigned a 10% disability rating for his dermatophytosis. The issue of an increased rating remains denied.
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD is linked to in-service stressors experienced during his service in Vietnam, and thus grants service connection for PTSD.
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for further development due to a change in the hearing judge.
The Board denied the appellant's claims for increased evaluations for his post-traumatic stress disorder, finding that the disability did not warrant a rating in excess of 30 percent prior to August 5, 1997 and did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation on or subsequent to that date.
The VA denied a higher evaluation for PTSD, finding that the veteran's symptoms did not meet criteria warranting an increased rating.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a psychiatric disability, including PTSD, and for special monthly pension based on the need for aid and attendance of another person. The veteran was found not to have current PTSD or other qualifying psychiatric conditions that are related to her military service.
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD, headaches, and nasoseptal deviation. However, the ratings for the veteran's knee disabilities remain unchanged.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.