PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) Board decisions

The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased disability rating for his service-connected PTSD, currently rated at 50 percent.

The Board has remanded the case for further development and adjudication due to incomplete records, need for additional medical opinions, and other procedural issues.

The Board has determined that the veteran's major depression and PTSD are not service-connected, as there is no evidence to support a direct link between his current conditions and his military service.

The Board denied increased evaluations for post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic arthritis of the lumbosacral spine, finding that the evidence did not support higher ratings.

The VA denied the veteran's claim for an increased disability evaluation for his service-connected PTSD, maintaining that it did not meet the criteria for a higher rating.

The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD is due to an in-service stressor and grants service connection for PTSD.

The Board found that the reduction in rating of the service-connected PTSD from 30 percent to 10 percent, effective on May 1, 1999, was not proper and must be voided ab initio.

The veteran's claim is being remanded due to her request for a Travel Board hearing at the RO.

The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of his service-connected PTSD is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and development.

The veteran's PTSD is not productive of total occupational and social impairment, warranting a 100% evaluation.,The veteran's left hand scar does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation.

The Board has determined that the veteran's bipolar disorder and PTSD were not incurred during active service, as there is no evidence of a traumatic in-service event or stressor. The veteran was found to have reactive depression during service but did not participate in combat.

The VA has decided to remand the case for further development due to lack of corroborating evidence of in-service stressors. The veteran needs to provide additional records and statements.

The Board previously denied the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD in May 1996. The current decision finds that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen this claim, as there is no verified in-service stressor.

The Board found that the veteran's claimed stressor of sexual assaults during her period of active duty service has not been verified, and she did not engage in combat with the enemy. Therefore, PTSD was not incurred in or aggravated by the veteran's active service.

The veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions are denied as there is no competent clinical evidence of any such conditions during or after his military service.

The Board has denied the veteran's request to reopen his claim of service connection for PTSD, finding that the new evidence submitted does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.

The Board has determined that the veteran's diagnosed PTSD is service-connected, with his stressors occurring during active duty aboard the USS Hawkins in Vietnam.

The Board has determined that additional development is needed to obtain the veteran's service medical records and private treatment records, as well as a VA examination for PTSD and malaria.

The Board has remanded the case to the RO for further development and adjudication on the merits of the claim for service connection for PTSD. The veteran's representative submitted medical evidence that must be considered by the agency of original jurisdiction.

The veteran's PTSD has resulted in total occupational and social impairment since June 1, 2002. The Board granted a higher rating of 70% for PTSD.