Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
168,869 vetted Board decisions for PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).
The Board found no evidence of current PTSD or other psychiatric disorder and denied the claim for service connection.
The veteran's PTSD is currently evaluated at 30 percent disabling, and the Board found that his symptoms do not warrant a higher rating.
The veteran's appeals regarding the reduction of his osteomyelitis rating and the assignment of a higher disability rating for his low back disorder were denied. The claim for an earlier effective date for service connection for PTSD was also denied.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining corroborating evidence of noncombat-related stressors and arranging for a VA psychiatric examination.
The veteran's PTSD is rated at 70 percent, effective January 21, 1998. The claim for TDIU due to service-connected PTSD is granted.
The veteran's claims for PTSD, tinnitus, and a residual shrapnel wound scar of the left leg were denied. The effective date for service connection for tinnitus was set at May 24, 2001.
The Board found that the veteran does not have PTSD and her ulcerative colitis is unrelated to service. The appeal was denied as there was no evidence of a valid stressor for PTSD, and the connection between PTSD and ulcerative colitis was also not established.
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD is related to an in-service sexual assault and grants service connection for this condition.
The veteran's claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder is being remanded due to the need for additional information from Dr. McG regarding the diagnosis and stressors of the veteran's PTSD.
The Board has remanded the case for further development and consideration, including VCAA compliance and a VA examination for PTSD. The veteran's claims of increased rating for PTSD, reopening of service connection claim for back injury, and TDIU are on appeal.
The Board has granted the veteran's claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The case was remanded due to new evidence submitted by the veteran and his representative, which included outpatient treatment records and a lay statement from another servicemember. The VA will now conduct further development of the medical evidence before making a final determination.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD, finding that there was no evidence of an in-service stressor and thus no basis to establish a diagnosis of PTSD.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA PTSD examination and social and industrial survey.
The veteran was granted service connection for PTSD in December 1999, but the effective date is being determined as it cannot be earlier than September 21, 1999 due to lack of evidence supporting combat participation.
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD based on new evidence provided by the veteran.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete notice and potential missing medical records. The veteran's claims of service connection for migraine headaches, increased rating for PTSD, and TDIU are now pending.
The case is being remanded for further development and readjudication due to the need for additional evidence.
The Board has granted a 100% rating for PTSD, indicating total industrial impairment.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a psychiatric disability, to include PTSD, finding that there was no evidence linking any current psychiatric condition to his military service. The Board noted that the only reference in the service medical records to a psychiatric issue was at enlistment and found no evidence of a stressor related to PTSD during service.
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional examination and development of evidence.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.