Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
168,869 vetted Board decisions for PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).
The Board has granted service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder and bilateral hearing loss, finding that the veteran's statements regarding combat exposure are consistent with his service record. The claims for residuals of a head injury and back injury are remanded for further development.
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA examination to assess the severity of PTSD and its impact on employment. The RO will also review the appellant's total disability rating claim.
The Board found that the veteran's current prostate condition, including benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) and prostatitis, did not begin during service and was not caused by any incident of service. The claim for PTSD was remanded due to inadequate examination.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the veteran's claimed PTSD, and further development is needed. The veteran must provide more specific information about his alleged stressors.
The Board has determined that the current development of the claim is inadequate and requires additional information regarding the veteran's claimed PTSD stressors, as well as verification of his service on the USS Independence in 1965. The case will be remanded for further action.
The veteran's appeal is remanded for further development, including scheduling VA examinations and obtaining medical records.
The veteran claims service connection for PTSD, but the Board has ordered remand due to insufficient evidence and need for further examination.
The Board has found that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD. The case is being remanded to the RO for further development of the evidence.
The Board found that the veteran did not engage in combat with the enemy and there is no credible evidence of the existence of an in-service stressor. Therefore, service connection for PTSD was denied.
The Board denied the veteran's claim of service connection for PTSD, finding that there was no evidence linking his verified stressor to his current diagnosis of PTSD. The veteran engaged in combat with the enemy during his active duty service.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claims of service connection for PTSD, myopic astigmatism, headaches, shoulder aches (claimed as muscle aches), rectal bleeding, and upset stomach. However, it denied these claims on their merits.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been presented to reopen the claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD. The issue of an increased rating for left wrist disability remains pending as its disposition is unknown.
The veteran is seeking higher initial and current ratings for his service-connected PTSD. The case must be remanded to ensure compliance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA).
The RO has denied an increased evaluation for PTSD and determined that the veteran is not entitled to a TDIU. The case is being remanded for further development, including obtaining updated treatment records and scheduling a VA psychiatric examination.
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary regarding the claims on appeal, including obtaining a medical expert opinion from VA to clarify the relationship between the veteran's service-connected PTSD and his alcohol and drug abuse, as well as their impact on his death.
The Board has granted an initial rating of 50 percent for PTSD, effective September 4, 2001.
The Board has granted an effective date of August 26, 1981 for the grant of service connection for PTSD. The veteran's alcohol abuse and organic brain syndrome are also found to be secondary to his service-connected PTSD.
The Board found no evidence that the veteran was unemployable due to his service-connected disabilities within one year prior to November 2, 2000. Therefore, an earlier effective date for TDIU is not warranted.
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD most closely approximates occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas, warranting a 70 percent rating.
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD is service-connected due to new and material evidence provided during her appeal.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.