Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
168,869 vetted Board decisions for PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD is related to in-service stressors and has granted service connection for PTSD.
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 30 percent for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of his treatment records and compliance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000.
The veteran's claim to reopen his PTSD service connection and seek an earlier effective date is being remanded for additional development.
The veteran's appeal was dismissed because he died during the pendency of his appeal.
The veteran's claim of entitlement to an initial disability rating in excess of 30 percent for service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder is being remanded by the Board due to procedural issues and need for additional development.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete records and further examination.
The veteran's claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder was granted. The issue of service connection for bilateral hearing loss is considered 'unknown' and the issue of an increased rating for residuals of a partial amputation of the right thumb is also considered 'unknown'.
The veteran's PTSD with depression has been rated at the highest possible level (100%) due to his demonstrable inability to obtain or retain employment.
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for PTSD due to new evidence submitted by the veteran, and will now consider whether this evidence is sufficient to establish service connection.
The Board found that there was no credible supporting evidence of the veteran's claimed in-service stressors and concluded that he does not have PTSD. Therefore, service connection for PTSD was denied.
The veteran's claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been granted. The appeal is based on the merits of his case and not due to any new evidence or a presumption.
The Board has granted the veteran's claim for service connection for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The decision is based on evidence that supports a finding of in-service stressors, leading to a determination that PTSD is related to military service.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD and to reopen his claim of entitlement to service connection for a left shoulder disorder. The denial was based on the lack of evidence linking these conditions to service.
The VA denied the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD, finding that there was no credible supporting evidence to show in-service stressors and thus no diagnosis of PTSD.
The Board has ordered further development due to incomplete records, particularly from the veteran's first tour of duty in Vietnam. The case will be remanded for additional development and consideration.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, diabetes with bilateral eye disability, infection of lymph nodes, and facial and left-sided paralysis. The appeals were based on presumed exposure to herbicides in Vietnam.
The Board has ordered further development in the veteran's case, including a psychiatric examination and an evaluation of ilio-inguinal neuritis. The appeal is remanded for additional development.
The veteran's PTSD is currently rated at 70 percent disabling effective August 8, 2002. The RO has granted a higher initial rating for his service-connected PTSD.
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD is incurred in active service and granted entitlement to service connection for this condition. The claim regarding a skin disorder due to Agent Orange exposure was denied as new and material evidence had not been submitted.
← Back to PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.