Radiculopathy & sciatica decisions — 2005
218 indexed Board decisions in 2005.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2005
The Board denied an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for several disabilities, including a right shoulder disorder, neck disorder, right knee disorder, and dental trauma, all claimed as residuals of injuries sustained in a truck accident during service on April 18, 1953. The veteran's claim was reopened and granted effective January 2, 2001.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2005
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to assess his service-connected disabilities and their impact on his ability to work.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The veteran's chronic lumbosacral strain with degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy has been rated at 40 percent since November 1978, based on severe limitation of motion and mild neurological deficit.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 60 percent for his lumbar strain with right-sided sciatica, finding that the disability did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The veteran's lumbosacral strain with spasms, disc protrusion at L5-S1, and mild degenerative disc disease was granted a 40 percent evaluation effective April 26, 1993. The right patellar fracture residuals were initially evaluated as 20 percent disabling from April 14, 1998.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The veteran's claims for PTSD and hypertension were denied, while his right lower extremity radiculopathy was granted. The left lower extremity radiculopathy claim is pending with a current rating of 10%.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The VA denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his low back disability and right lower extremity radiculopathy, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under the applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The VA determined that the veteran's service-connected lumbar spine disc disease does not warrant a higher initial disability rating, as it does not meet the criteria for severe impairment or incapacitating episodes.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a rating in excess of 60 percent for his back disability and for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The Board has jurisdiction over the November 1998 rating decision that denied service connection for thoracic injury with local atrophy of the spinal cord; fracture of T12-L1, dorsal kyphosis. Service connection is granted based on aggravation.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The veteran's service-connected disabilities, including major depressive disorder and degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral spine, are found to be sufficient for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2005
The veteran requested to withdraw his appeal, and the Board has dismissed it.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The Board has granted a 60 percent rating for the veteran's service-connected chronic low back strain with left L5 radiculopathy, effective from April 1996. The claim for a compensable rating for symblepharon outer angle of the left eye due to abrasion is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board denied a rating in excess of 60 percent for the veteran's service-connected spondylolisthesis, finding that the evidence did not warrant such an increase.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The RO improperly reduced the evaluation assigned to the veteran's herniated disc with left sciatica from 60 percent to 20 percent, effective March 1, 2002. The claim for an increased evaluation remains pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2005
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for lumbosacral degenerative disc and joint disease with history of radiculopathy is being remanded due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the impact of his service-connected disability versus the automobile accident.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2005
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including VA examinations to determine the etiology of the veteran's claimed conditions and whether they are related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2005
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including scheduling a VA examination and obtaining additional medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The veteran's appeal is denied as his claim for a rating in excess of 30 percent for residuals of chip fracture, left hip, with traumatic arthritis was denied. His claims for service connection were also denied, but he was granted new and material evidence to reopen the claim for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine with left radiculopathy, status post laminectomy at L5, secondary to his service-connected left hip disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The veteran's service-connected residuals of whiplash injury of the cervical spine with radiculopathy to the left upper extremity are manifested by significant neuropathic pain residual, but without EMG evidence of acute or chronic denervation changes in the musculature of the left upper extremity. This is consistent with no more than mild incomplete paralysis of all radicular groups.
← Back to Radiculopathy & sciatica overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.