Radiculopathy & sciatica decisions — 2011
599 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's bowel incontinence is found to be related to his service-connected lumbar spine disability, and a separate 10 percent rating is granted. Service connection for cervical radiculopathy secondary to facet syndrome with sclerosis, lumbosacral spine, is also granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for lumbar disc disease with radiculopathy, finding insufficient evidence to support a grant of this benefit.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude gainful employment consistent with his education and occupational experience.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran is seeking service connection for right radiculopathy that he claims is secondary to his service-connected lumbar paravertebral myositis. The case has been remanded due to the need for translations of some documents.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's post-operative residuals of a laminectomy with radiculopathy of the lumbosacral spine have resulted in some, but not total, range of motion loss and no incapacitating episodes in the past 12 months. The Board finds that her disability does not warrant a rating higher than 40 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional examinations to determine the current severity of his service-connected disabilities and their impact on his capacity for substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's TDIU was granted effective June 11, 2008. The Board denied an earlier effective date as the evidence did not show unemployability prior to this date.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's cervical spine disorder is not related to his military service or secondary to his service-connected dorsolumbar disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been presented to reopen the claim of service connection for carpal tunnel syndrome. The issue of service connection for a low back disorder is remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's low back strain was rated at 10 percent prior to October 7, 2008 and denied for higher ratings. Service connection for left leg radiculopathy was also denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining additional medical records and scheduling a VA examination to determine the Veteran's current functional and occupational capacity due to his service-connected disabilities. The case will be readjudicated after these actions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a low back condition with radiculopathy, finding no evidence of an in-service injury or chronic disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's low back disorder and headaches have been granted increased ratings, with the low back disorder receiving a 40 percent rating effective December 10, 2009. The headaches received a 10 percent rating prior to September 24, 2009, and a 30 percent rating from that date.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Board has determined that the grant of service connection for left leg radiculopathy was clearly and unmistakably erroneous, and thus severed from the Veteran's service-connected lumbar spine degenerative disc disease. The claim for a separate evaluation for radiculopathy is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The RO reduced the disability ratings for Post Diskectomy, Herniated Nucleus Pulposus, L4-L5, Degenerative Disc Disease of the Cervical Spine, and Peripheral Radiculopathy of the Left Upper Extremity from their current levels to 20 percent each. The reduction was proper as there is evidence of improvement in these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have been found to preclude locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes or a wheelchair. The Board has granted entitlement to specially adapted housing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including scheduling a VA examination and obtaining medical records.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities, when combined, meet the criteria for a TDIU. The evidence is at least in equipoise as to whether the Veteran is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical opinions and records related to the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection of chronic IBS, chronic head injury residuals, and a chronic headache disorder to include migraines were denied. The Veteran's cervical spine disability was granted an increased rating to 20%, while his lumbar spine disability was granted a 60% rating from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2005, and a 20% rating thereafter. Separate ratings of 10% were assigned for right sciatica and left sciatica. The Veteran's trapezius muscle strain was granted a 10% evaluation. Finally, the Veteran's panic disorder with depression was granted an initial disability evaluation in excess of 10 percent.
← Back to Radiculopathy & sciatica overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.