Radiculopathy & sciatica decisions — 2019
3,200 indexed Board decisions in 2019.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and effective dates were denied. The TDIU claim was also remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
The Veteran's bilateral femoral and sciatic nerve disorders, as well as his bilateral hip disorder and foot skin disorder (tinea pedis and onychomycosis), are all granted effective from February 17, 2005.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 20 percent, but the Board denied an increased rating. The TDIU claim was also denied as his service-connected disabilities do not preclude him from obtaining or maintaining substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
The Veteran's lumbar spine disability, right and left lower extremity radiculopathies are granted with a 20% rating for the entire appeal period.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date and a higher rating for his left sciatic nerve radiculopathy, stating that it is part of his service-connected lumbar spine disability rated under DC 5293.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
The Veteran is granted annual VA clothing allowances for the year 2017 due to use of his bilateral knee braces, which tend to wear out his pants.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for left knee disability, right knee disability, left leg disability with sciatica, and left eye disability due to incomplete service treatment records. The Veteran will be afforded new VA examinations to address these issues.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
The Veteran's application to reopen his claim for service connection for sleep apnea was granted. His radiculopathy of the left lower extremity (sciatic) associated with lumbar degenerative disc disease with radiating symptoms into the left lower extremity is rated at 10 percent, and his major depressive disorder remains at a 30 percent rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Board denied earlier effective dates for the establishment of service connection for left lumbosacral radiculopathy and lower extremity sensory polyneuropathy, right lower extremity sensory polyneuropathy, left internal saphenous nerve, and right internal saphenous nerve. The effective date was assigned as March 21, 2017.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional medical opinions and examinations to address the nature, etiology, severity, and service connection of his gastrointestinal disorder, urinary dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, and lumbar spondylosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Veteran's back condition did not manifest ankylosis or incapacitating episodes during the period on appeal. The Board denied a higher disability rating for DJD of the lumbar spine.,The Veteran withdrew his claim for increased tinnitus prior to the promulgation of a decision by the Board.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's neck disability is related to his service. The VA will need to obtain additional medical opinions and records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Board has remanded the cases for a new examination to assess the current severity of the Veteran's bilateral lower extremity neuropathies due to his testimony suggesting that the previous examination was not fully representative.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss has been reopened, and he is now entitled to a disability rating of 20 percent for his spondylolisthesis at L5-S1. His right lower extremity radiculopathy also warrants a 40 percent disability rating. However, the TDIU claim was denied as the Veteran's service-connected conditions do not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
The Veteran's onychomycosis of the bilateral toenails and left leg radiculopathy have been granted increased ratings. The onychomycosis is rated at 10 percent, while the left leg radiculopathy is rated at 20 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Veteran's TDIU claim is denied prior to August 22, 2018 and remanded for further development due to insufficient information on his employability from that date forward.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2019
The Veteran's right shoulder disorder is denied as there is no evidence of injury during service and the earliest documented chronic condition is several years after service.,The Veteran's sciatic radiculopathy was rated at 20% effective January 5, 2016, based on a VA peripheral nerve examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy and lumbar spine spondylosis with degenerative disc disease due to inadequate examinations and incomplete evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have been shown to preclude substantially gainful employment, and the Board finds that a TDIU on an extraschedular basis is warranted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2019
A rating in excess of 10 percent for lumbar spondylosis is denied.,A rating of 20 percent, but no higher, for left lower radiculopathy is granted, subject to the laws and regulations governing the payment of monetary benefits.,A rating of 20 percent, but no higher, for right lower radiculopathy is granted, subject to the laws and regulations governing the payment of monetary benefits.
← Back to Radiculopathy & sciatica overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.