Scars decisions — 2003
319 indexed Board decisions in 2003.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2003
The Board has ordered further development in the veteran's case, including examinations for glaucoma, right shoulder disorder, and right cheek laceration scar. The appeal is currently pending due to ongoing administrative issues.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2003
The veteran's claims for increased ratings and a total rating based on individual unemployability were denied. The RO also did not address the service connection theory or exposure basis.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2003
The veteran's service-connected conditions were all granted increased evaluations.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected scar of the forehead does not meet or approximate the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent under any applicable diagnostic code.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2003
The Board has granted a 20 percent rating for the service-connected shell fragment wound scar involving muscle groups I, III and IV of the left upper extremity. A separate 10 percent rating is also granted for the painful scar associated with this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2003
The Board has granted increased ratings of 10 percent for the residuals of a shell fragment wound to the left thigh, and separate noncompensable evaluations for scars on the left cheek and left forearm.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2003
The veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for his service-connected status post traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta with thoracotomy scar is being remanded due to additional development and compliance with VCAA requirements.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2003
The Board granted service connection for the veteran's residual chorioretinal scar of the right eye from chorioretinitis/choroidosis and assigned a 10 percent rating, effective October 12, 2001.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2003
The Board has remanded the case due to failure to comply with VCAA and duty-to-assist provisions. The veteran's claim for service connection for retina macular scarring of the left eye is pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2003
The Board has granted service connection for headaches and determined that the veteran's current disability is etiologically related to his active military service. The issue of an initial compensable rating for scars as residuals of a shell fragment wound to the right thigh remains pending due to missing or destroyed service medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2003
The veteran's service connection for status post left anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with scars and status post open reduction internal fixation of left ulnar and radius compound fracture with scars has been denied. The RO assigned initial evaluations of 10 percent for each disability.,No higher evaluations are warranted as the evidence does not show severe instability or severe subluxation in the knee, nor nonunion in the lower half of the ulna or ankylosis of the wrist.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2003
The veteran's service-connected disabilities did not meet the criteria for additional dependency and indemnity compensation as of eight years prior to his death.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2003
The Board has granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities, as the veteran's service-connected conditions prevent him from engaging in substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2003
The veteran's service-connected disabilities, which include knee disability, ankle arthritis, and hip impairment, do not prevent him from engaging in substantially gainful employment given his education and experience.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2003
The veteran's headaches are service-connected and rated at 10%. The left eye epiphora is also service-connected and rated at 10%, effective from June 25, 1960. The scars on the face, forehead, and left eyelid are service-connected and rated at 10%.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2003
The Board has determined that the appellant's current nose scar is the residual of a knife attack in service, resulting in lacerations to his nose and right hand. As such, the Board finds that there is an approximate balance between positive and negative evidence with regard to the claim for service connection for a scar on the nose.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2003
The Board has remanded the case for readjudication of the initial disability rating for cystic acne vulgaris, taking into consideration all evidence including new evidence since the last SSOC.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2003
The Board found no evidence of a service connection for the veteran's bilateral eye disorder or burn scars of both arms, as his statements were deemed not credible and there was no documented injury in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2003
The Board denied the appellant's claims for an increased rating for his scar residual, left ring finger and service connection for palm contracture, left palm. The Board found that there was no evidence to support a finding of service connection for the palm contracture as it is not related to the service-connected left ring finger residuals.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to pending issues regarding service connection for various conditions, including bilateral hearing loss, a scar of the right buttocks, and removal of the right testicle. The case is now remanded for additional examination and review.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.