Scars decisions — 2005
627 indexed Board decisions in 2005.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2005
The Board found that the veteran knowingly submitted false representations in his claim for VA benefits, leading to forfeiture of his rights and claims. The decision denied the forfeiture action.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2005
The Board found that the veteran's current arrhythmias and premature ventricular contractions are related to his service-connected PTSD, specifically due to myocarditis caused by scarlet fever during service. The Board granted service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's right cornea scar does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under VA's schedular guidelines, and thus denied an initial compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board found that the veteran's claimed conditions were not related to his military service, including exposure to herbicides. The RO denied all issues on appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The Board has granted the veteran increased evaluations for his service-connected right wrist fracture, left leg muscle injury due to gunshot wound, and left leg gunshot wound scar. The nasal septum deviation is rated as noncompensable.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The veteran's service-connected scar and status post inguinal herniorrhaphy have been rated, but the current ratings are not higher than what is allowed under VA regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board denied service connection for left shoulder strain and right index finger scar residual. The veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for the scar was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for initial compensable ratings for his renal cyst, hemorrhoids, and scars. The evidence did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under applicable VA rating criteria.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board denied service connection for a left knee disability and tooth loss, finding no evidence of such disabilities being incurred in or aggravated by service. The veteran's current left knee disability is not related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2005
The Board has requested an independent medical expert (IME) opinion and the veteran submitted additional argument and evidence. The case is being remanded to the RO for further review of the issues on appeal, including all evidence submitted since the February 2005 supplemental statements of the case.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's low back disability, including chronic lumbar strain and lumbar disc protrusion, was incurred in service.,The Board also found that the scars of the left shoulder were incurred in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for an operculated (retinal) tear of the eye and a left eye scar were denied as there is no objective medical evidence to support these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The veteran's initial compensable rating for his chin scar was granted, with a 10% evaluation effective October 24, 1994. The other service connection claims were not addressed in this decision.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The veteran's claim for a higher rating was granted, and he is now receiving a 10 percent evaluation for his left shoulder disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The Board has granted a 10 percent rating for the veteran's scars of the left tibia, which is the maximum schedular rating available under current regulations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2005
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including VA examinations to assess the severity of his PTSD and other service-connected conditions. The case will be returned to the Board for readjudication.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for dental trauma, prostate cancer, and scars, all claimed as due to exposure to ionizing radiation. The right leg disorder claim was not addressed in this decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2005
The Board has ordered further development due to the need for a line of duty determination and an examination to determine if the veteran's head injury is service-connected.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The veteran's service-connected right middle and ring finger disabilities are rated at 10% each, resulting in a combined rating of 20%. The VA determined that these conditions do not meet the criteria for TDIU due to their impact on his employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The veteran's claim for a compensable rating for service-connected old scarring, right hemithorax, secondary to pneumonia was denied by the RO.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.