Scars decisions — 2007
696 indexed Board decisions in 2007.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2007
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to missing service medical records and insufficient evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a back disorder, PTSD, and an initial compensable rating for his chest scar. The evidence did not support these claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected disabilities prevent him from securing and following a substantially gainful occupation, warranting an extraschedular TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2007
The veteran's service-connected flak wound residuals of the right thigh are rated at 30 percent, and his service-connected scar of the right thigh is rated as noncompensable. The Board finds that both conditions meet the criteria for increased ratings.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The veteran's claims for higher initial evaluations for his left knee disability, fractures of the first proximal phalanx and skull, and scars on his forehead and chin have been denied as there is no indication that these conditions are service-connected. The RO has not assigned a compensable evaluation to any of these disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for hepatitis C and residual scars from a rib biopsy, finding that his symptoms did not warrant higher ratings under applicable diagnostic codes. The veteran's TDIU claim was also denied as he is able to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2007
The veteran's appeal has been dismissed as he withdrew his appeal in April 2007.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The Board denied increased ratings for the veteran's service-connected residuals of a shell fragment wound, vitiligo, and varicosities. The scar from the right lower leg was assigned a 10 percent rating effective May 1, 2003.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2007
The Board has determined that additional development is needed before the claim can be adjudicated, including obtaining service medical records and Social Security Administration records. The veteran will also need to undergo a VA examination to determine his current back condition and scar.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The Board denied service connection for chronic respiratory disability and residuals of lead poisoning due to asbestos exposure in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The veteran's initial claim for service connection was denied, and he appealed the decision. The Board remanded the case multiple times to obtain additional evidence.,After obtaining necessary information and evidence, it was determined that the veteran had a scar residual of shrapnel wound on his left knee since October 6, 1969. However, there is no evidence showing limitation of function due to this condition prior to September 13, 2000.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJune 2007
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected elbow and thigh injuries were partially granted, with a 30% rating assigned for the left posterior thigh condition. The elbow condition remains at 10%. The effective date is not specified.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of scarring or burns during service, and the veteran does not have a current disability related to his claimed condition. Therefore, the claim for service connection for scars resulting from burns is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The Board found that the veteran did not have exposure to mustard gas or Lewisite during service and thus could not establish a claim for service connection based on such exposure. The Board also determined that there was no evidence of combat, which is required for claims involving PTSD. As a result, the veteran's claims were denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The veteran's death was not service-connected, but he had a combined disability rating of at least 90% for over ten years prior to his death. The claim is denied as the criteria for DIC under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 are not met.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The veteran's claim for increased ratings for his lumbosacral spine disability and lumbar spine scar was denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a rating in excess of 40 percent for the lumbosacral spine disability, as there were no incapacitating episodes or other factors warranting such an increase. For the lumbar spine scar, the Board noted that it was not painful and did not limit function.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2007
The Board granted increased disability evaluations for the veteran's service-connected residuals of shell fragment wounds, with a 30 percent rating assigned for each issue. The effective date is not specified.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's postoperative scar, left inguinal herniorrhaphy does not meet or approximate criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.