Scars decisions — 2008
737 indexed Board decisions in 2008.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2008
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a detailed VA examination of his second degree burn scars from his right shoulder to his right thigh. The RO will schedule another examination and consider the results in determining an appropriate disability rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The veteran's service-connected scars and sensory neuropathy have been rated as noncompensable, but the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.,Service connection for residuals of left tympanic membrane perforation and residuals of left eye trauma are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for a 30 percent rating for facial scars and for service connection of residuals of nasal fractures, finding that no factual ascertainability existed prior to October 31, 2005.,The RO granted service connection for nasal fractures on June 2006 but assigned an effective date of October 31, 2005, based on the veteran's claim for increased rating for facial scars.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board found that the veteran does not have any residuals of burn scars on his right hand and denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · September 2008
The veteran's service connection claim for headaches was denied, as there is no credible evidence of a current headache disorder. The total disability rating based on individual unemployability claim was also denied due to the lack of evidence linking his service-connected disabilities to his inability to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2008
The veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for scars on the right malar bone and lower lip is being remanded to allow scheduling of a videoconference hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board denied a higher initial evaluation for facial scarring, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for an increased rating under any applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2008
The veteran's service-connected conditions, including migraine headaches, sleep apnea, and knee/shoulder disabilities, render him unemployable. The Board has granted a TDIU based on these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and an initial compensable rating for his appendectomy scar, finding no new and material evidence to reopen the hearing loss claim and denying a compensable rating for the scar.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2008
The case is being remanded for further development of the veteran's claims, including verification of his claimed stressors and a VA examination to determine if he has PTSD related to a verified in-service stressor.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2008
The veteran's scarring of the forehead was initially granted a noncompensable evaluation, and later upgraded to a 10 percent disability rating effective June 4, 2008. The current evaluation is within the range allowed by the criteria for superficial scars.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board denied service connection for PTSD due to the lack of a current diagnosis and credible supporting evidence of an in-service stressor.,For bilateral pes planus, the veteran's disability is not rated higher than 10 percent as there is no objective evidence of severe flatfoot with marked deformity or swelling on use.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2008
The veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected MRSA infection of the right wrist with dermatitis and scarring is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board has determined that the evidence received since the July 1993 rating decision is not new and material, and thus the veteran's claims for service connection for a head injury and fever have been denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board determined that an effective date earlier than October 3, 2001 for the grant of a 10 percent disability rating for the veteran's scar, abscess of the back is not warranted.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The VA determined that the veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred in or aggravated by active military service.,The VA also found no evidence of a current disability for VA purposes regarding right arm injury with residual scar, thus denying entitlement to a compensable evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2008
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for proper VCAA notice regarding increased disability ratings.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2008
The Board found that the veteran's pre-existing lung scarring existed prior to his active service and was not aggravated during service. As such, the claim for service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current disability of bilateral hearing loss or residuals of burns to the abdomen and groin, and therefore service connection for these conditions is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2008
The veteran is granted earlier effective dates of October 26, 1984 for the award of a 60 percent rating for service-connected pulmonary tuberculosis with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and for service connection for a thoracotomy scar.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.