Scars decisions — 2011
716 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's scar does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation under any applicable rating code, as it is stable and non-disabling.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2011
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, asthma, and a right hand scar, do not prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation consistent with his education and employment background.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2011
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities (depressive disorder, left and right knee disorders) render him unemployable from performing all forms of substantially gainful employment that are consistent with his education and occupational experience. The Board finds in favor of the claimant due to equipoise evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2011
The Veteran's appeal for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was denied because there is no medical evidence detailing the residual disability resulting from his 1981 VA surgery, and no medical opinion exploring whether any resulting disability was unforeseeable or due to VA carelessness.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2011
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for scars of the nose, right cheek, and behind the ear is being remanded due to the need for additional examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2011
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was denied as the proximate cause of his additional disability (bilateral inner thigh scarring) was not due to carelessness, negligence, or lack of proper skill on VA's part.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2011
The Veteran's service-connected degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral spine is granted with a rating of 20 percent effective July 17, 2008. The ratings for varicose veins in both lower extremities and chondrocalcinosis of the left knee are denied. The Veteran's residual scar from the excision of a cyst on his wrist is also granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2011
The Veteran's facial scars, left wrist muscle injury, right shoulder and neck muscle injury, left foot scar, left wrist scar, right knee scar, right lower extremity scar, and right ankle scar are all rated at 30 percent each.,Service connection for PTSD was granted with an effective date of May 22, 2009. Service connection for neuralgia of the left foot was also granted but without a specific effective date.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2011
The Veteran's service-connected painful scars of the bilateral breasts, residuals of reduction mammoplasty, are rated at a 10 percent disability effective October 23, 2008.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2011
The Veteran's tendonitis of the right elbow with a scar is related to his military service and he has been granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2011
The Veteran's claim for an increase rating for dermatitis with scars, also claimed as eczema, is being remanded due to the need for clarification regarding the percentage of affected skin area and the prescribed topical hydrocortisone treatment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2011
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and development of his claims file. The RO will arrange for an examination by a VA physician to assess whether his service-connected disabilities, alone or in combination with any non-service connected conditions, render him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2011
The Veteran is granted service connection for a scar over the right eyebrow area, but his claim for a back disorder is denied as there is no current evidence of a disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected scars of the right side of the neck and scar of the right arm do not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation under VA rating criteria.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of his VA treatment records and an addendum to the December 2010 VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left eye corneal scar was aggravated by service, and therefore service connection is granted. The claims for bilateral senile cataracts and bilateral LASIK post-surgical scars are denied as there is no evidence of a current disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2011
The Veteran's claims for higher initial ratings on his service-connected conditions have been denied. The RO has granted service connection and assigned noncompensable disability ratings to all of the Veteran's service-connected conditions, effective December 1, 2003.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2011
The Veteran's service-connected scar tissue has not met the criteria for a compensable rating under current VA regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2011
VA determined that the Veteran's scars do not meet the criteria for a compensable disability evaluation, as they are not tender or painful and do not cause limitation of function.,VA also found that the Veteran's traumatic arthritic residuals of a fractured left hip do not warrant an increased rating beyond 10 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2011
The Veteran's scar residuals of a tumor removal of the right parotid area of the right neck, including Frey's syndrome, have been rated as 30 percent disabling since November 24, 2011.,Effective October 23, 2008, the Veteran's scar residuals of a tumor removal of the right parotid area of the right neck are rated at 30 percent.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.