Scars decisions — 2014
864 indexed Board decisions in 2014.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable, as his right wrist disability has not prevented him from securing or following substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2014
The Veteran's appeal for an increased evaluation for his right eye disability has been dismissed as he is satisfied with the current evaluations. The claim of entitlement to a TDIU based on service-connected disabilities has not met the criteria for assignment of a total rating due to unemployability.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2014
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed as he withdrew his appeal for the issue of entitlement to a compensable initial evaluation for bilateral hearing loss. The case is now limited to the issue of service connection for scarring on both eyes/dry eyes.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, prostate disability, Bell's palsy, bilateral ankle disability, and scars have been denied. The Veteran's hearing loss claim has also been denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Veteran's scar on the left thigh, residual of a shrapnel wound, does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation as it is currently rated at 10 percent and does not cause limitation of motion or significant muscle impairment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2014
The Veteran's claims for an increased disability rating and earlier effective date are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including diagnostic testing and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss was denied, as the evidence did not show sufficient hearing loss to be considered a ratable disability. The claim for an increased rating for status post shrapnel wound with scar and residual left VIII intercostal neuritis is remanded due to the need for issuance of a Statement of the Case.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Veteran's claims for a compensable disability rating for corneal scar, right eye and an initial compensable disability rating for allergic rhinitis have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not show vision of 20/50 in both eyes or greater than 50 percent obstruction of the nasal passages on both sides, respectively. The Veteran's claim for TDIU was also denied as there is no evidence showing his service-connected disabilities preclude him from securing and following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2014
The Veteran is unable to obtain or retain substantially gainful employment due to his musculoskeletal disabilities and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with panic disorder, agoraphobia, and dysthymia.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for scheduling a videoconference hearing and addressing new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Veteran's death due to gastric carcinoma was not etiologically linked to his service or any incidents therein or his service-connected disabilities. The basic criteria for entitlement to dependency and indemnity compensation benefits pursuant to 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 have not been met.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2014
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for initial compensable ratings for skin graft of the left leg and scar of the right lower abdomen. The Board, therefore, dismisses these claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2014
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a skin disability of the left foot has been reopened, and he is granted service connection.,Service connection is granted for a corneal scar of the right eye as it is presumed to be related to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2014
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for residuals of a gunshot wound of the abdomen. Further development is needed to determine if there was aggravation during service and whether current complaints are related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Veteran's claim for service connection for residual scarring from stab wounds was denied as there is no evidence of a current disability and the Veteran did not sustain any injuries during his active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2014
The Veteran's appeal involves multiple issues including service connection for TBI, PTSD, right ankle DJD, and cholecystectomy with residual scar. The case is being remanded to obtain additional records, conduct examinations, and review the claims file.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2014
The Veteran's service-connected lower extremity gunshot wound disabilities, right eye aphakia with scar, and other conditions have caused him to be in need of the regular aid and attendance of another person due to his inability to walk, dress/undress, bathe, groom, toilet, and protect himself from hazardous or dangerous environmental conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · June 2014
The Veteran's skin disabilities, including chloracne and eczema, are being remanded for a more thorough examination to determine if they are related to his service in Vietnam, specifically exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2014
The Veteran's painful scars of the abdomen and left hip have been granted a 10 percent disability rating, effective March 26, 2009.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2014
The Veteran's appeals for increased ratings for his service-connected inguinal hernia scar and hypogonadism have been dismissed due to the withdrawal of the appeal by the Veteran and his representative.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.