Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
28,414 vetted Board decisions for Scars.
The veteran's claim for a total disability rating due to unemployability caused by service-connected disabilities prior to February 24, 1998 was denied. The effective date of the TDIU award is set at February 24, 1998.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete service records and a need for further examination. The veteran's claims for service connection are pending.
The veteran's scars status post shrapnel injury to the right forearm are not compensable, and his claim for service connection of nerve damage to the right arm and right forearm is denied.
The veteran's claims for service connection for an eye disorder and a left cheek scar resulting from a shrapnel wound below the left eye have been reopened. However, his claim for an eye disorder remains denied as new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen it. The claim for a left cheek scar is ongoing with the VA still considering whether the veteran's current condition is related to service.
The veteran's death was not due to a service-connected disability. The appellant's claims for accrued benefits and service connection were denied.
The Board finds that the preponderance of the evidence is against the veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for the service-connected residual scarring of the bladder outlet, status post radiation treatment for prostate cancer.
The Board has granted a compensable rating of 10 percent for the postoperative scar and a separate 10 percent rating for incomplete paralysis of the left facial nerve, effective from the date of receipt of the veteran's claim.
The veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for a certificate of eligibility for financial assistance in purchasing an automobile or adaptive equipment, nor does he qualify for a certificate of eligibility for assistance in acquiring specially adapted housing.
The veteran's squamous and basal cell carcinoma with actinic keratoses is granted service connection. His residual scar from a shell fragment wound to the left forearm is rated at 10 percent, which is the highest rating available under current criteria.
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected recurrent left inguinal hernia and left inguinal hernia scar with nerve entrapment warrant a 10 percent disability rating each, as there is no evidence of recurrence or unoperated irremediable hernias.
The veteran's claim for a higher rating and earlier effective date for his right arm scar were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support an increase in disability prior to April 23, 2002, when he filed his new claim.
The Board found that the veteran's burn scars of the medial thighs were not incurred or aggravated in active service and denied his claim for service connection.
The VA has denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected residuals of a head injury with facial scars, as the current rating of 10% is deemed sufficient to cover his condition.
The veteran's service-connected conditions have been evaluated, and the Board has determined that no increased ratings are warranted for any of his service-connected disabilities.
The Board found that the veteran's death from a cerebral infarction due to vascular thrombosis was not caused by or related to his service-connected disabilities, including his right leg circulatory deficiency.
The Board found that the veteran's prostate cancer was not incurred in or aggravated by his active duty service and denied the claim. The facial scar issue is pending as a separate matter.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 10 percent for his chest wall injury, finding that the evidence did not support a higher evaluation due to moderate disability and no significant impairment.
The veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection are being REMANDED to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC) in Washington, DC. The case will be returned to the Board for further appellate consideration if appropriate.
The Board has determined that the veteran's left eardrum perforation and resulting scarring are service-connected.
The VA has granted service connection for the scar on the back of the neck and assigned a 10 percent rating effective August 30, 2002. The veteran is entitled to this higher rating under the revised criteria for evaluating scars.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.