Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
28,414 vetted Board decisions for Scars.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected residuals of nephrectomy with partial adrenalectomy, finding that he does not have renal dysfunction associated with this disability.
The Veteran's appeal for higher initial ratings and increased rating issues, as well as his claim for a TDIU due to service-connected disabilities, were granted. His combined disability rating is now at 80 percent.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have not rendered her unable to secure and follow substantially gainful occupation consistent with her educational and occupational background.
From July 10, 2002 to March 8, 2012, the Veteran's service-connected disabilities combined rendered him unable to obtain or maintain gainful employment.,As of March 9, 2012, the issue of entitlement to a TDIU is moot due to the Veteran receiving a 100% rating for PTSD.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a scar between the right eyebrow and nose is being remanded due to incomplete information or evidence. The case will be reviewed again after additional development, including scheduling a VA examination.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, left knee disability, right knee disability, and scars of the knees have been denied. The Board found no evidence of a current bilateral hearing loss disability for VA purposes and concluded that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for service connection based on direct evidence.
The Veteran's right long finger scar is unstable and has been rated at 10 percent for the entire initial rating period on appeal. The remaining scars have resolved.
The Veteran's claim for higher ratings for his right middle finger scar and limitation of motion, as well as the TDIU claim, were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under the applicable diagnostic codes.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the schedular criteria for a TDIU rating, and referral for extraschedular consideration is denied.
The Veteran's appeal was denied for entitlement to earlier effective dates for TDIU, DEA, and PTSD. The RO granted these benefits on April 4, 2011.
The Veteran's service-connected schizoaffective disorder, depressive type with panic disorder with agoraphobia with psychotic features necessitates the need for regular aid and attendance due to his extreme mental health disability.
The Veteran's service-connected left knee scars, residuals of shell fragment wound (SFW), measure no more than 0.15 square centimeters and do not cause limitation of motion or function. The rating schedule is adequate to rate the disability.
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not cause his death. The VA examiner opined that the Veteran's blindness, gunshot wound scar on the left leg, and scars of the face and forehead did not contribute to his death.
The Board finds that the evidence does not support a finding of a current gynecological disability, specifically uterine fibroids and residuals of a miscarriage, causally related to service.
The Veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for his service-connected conditions have been denied. The current ratings of 10 percent are maintained.
The Board has remanded the appeal due to ambiguity regarding whether the Veteran's center neck scar resulted from May 10, 1999 or May 24, 1999 surgery. The case will be further developed and a new opinion is required.
The Veteran is entitled to a TDIU for the period from September 1, 2011 until July 7, 2016 due to his service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions and records.
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are denied as the earliest date of claim is March 13, 2009.
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn by his representative, and the Board is dismissing the appeal.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.