Shoulder decisions — 2006
1,057 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2006
The veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than November 19, 2003, for a 10 percent rating for sinusitis is granted. His other claims are either denied or continue to be pending based on the evidence currently available.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for arthritis, a right shoulder disability, a right thigh disability, and chest pain due to lack of current diagnoses.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for left shoulder and low back conditions, as well as his claim for an increased evaluation for chondromalacia of the left knee. The claims for DJD for multiple joints are being remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have PTSD, diabetes mellitus as a result of service exposure to Agent Orange, impotency due to his service-connected conditions or hypertension. The claims for these conditions are therefore denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The VA denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for PTSD and residuals of a shrapnel wound to the left shoulder, both rated at 30 percent. The VA found that neither condition warranted an increase in rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The VA denied the veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 30 percent for his service-connected gunshot wound to the chest and shoulder, finding that the disability is currently rated appropriately based on its current severity.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2006
The veteran's appeal for increased ratings on his cervical spine and left shoulder disabilities has been withdrawn. The initial rating of 20 percent for each condition remains in effect.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The veteran does not have a diagnosed condition of PTSD, nor any other service-connected disabilities as claimed. The Board finds that the evidence does not support the claims for service connection.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2006
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claims for service connection for various disorders. However, the claims are still denied as there is no clear evidence of service origin or aggravation.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2006
The veteran's right shoulder disability, which is service-connected and characterized by pain throughout the entire arm motion with limited motion and deltoid atrophy, has been rated as 30 percent disabling. The Board has determined that a higher rating of 40 percent is warranted based on the evidence showing more than midrange motion and significant functional loss due to pain.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2006
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of his service-connected left shoulder disability is being remanded due to the need for additional examination and development.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board denied service connection for left shoulder and cervical spine disabilities in August 2000, finding no evidence of a relationship to service. New evidence received since then does not establish such a relationship.,New evidence supports the claim that the veteran's cervical spine disability is related to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board found that the veteran's right shoulder disability is not related to his service-connected left upper extremity disabilities and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including hearing loss and degenerative joint disease of the shoulders, knees, and feet. The adjustment disorder with depressed mood claim was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board denied increased evaluations for the veteran's service-connected disabilities, including removal of ribs and residuals of a gunshot wound to the left shoulder and chest. The current ratings remain at 40 percent for removal of ribs and 30 percent for residuals of the gunshot wound.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2006
The Board has granted a 10 percent rating for each of the veteran's service-connected shoulder scars, effective from the date of the decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for right and left ankle disorders, as well as his claim for an increased evaluation for degenerative joint disease of the left knee. The evidence does not support a finding of current diagnoses or a link to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including PTSD, arthritis of the left shoulder, acne, diarrhea, sexual dysfunction, eye disability, and thumb condition. The denial is based on a lack of credible evidence supporting the occurrence of claimed in-service stressors.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's left knee disorder and bilateral shoulder disorders were not incurred or aggravated during service, nor are they proximately due to a service-connected disability. The evidence does not support a finding of chronicity.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine if any current left arm pathology, including tendinitis of the left rotator cuff or neurological impairment, is related to service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.