Shoulder decisions — 2010
1,418 indexed Board decisions in 2010.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral foot and shoulder conditions were denied. The claims for new and material evidence for left ankle condition and mild myopia with mild astigmatism, left eye, were granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for left shoulder and left ankle disabilities are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2010
The Veteran's initial ratings for his bilateral shoulder disabilities have been granted, with the right (major) shoulder disability receiving a higher rating than the left (minor) shoulder.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a foot disability, Hepatitis C, or right shoulder disability related to her service. The claims are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current right shoulder disorder related to service and denied his claims for service connection. The increased rating claims for both right wrist disability and Crohn's disease were also denied.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJune 2010
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of a right shoulder disability is withdrawn. The narcolepsy claim has been reopened due to new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's service-connected degenerative joint disease of the right shoulder and wrist do not meet the criteria for a higher disability rating under applicable VA regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have diagnosed arthritis of the right shoulder, and his claims for bilateral defective hearing and tinnitus are denied as there is no current disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and arranging for a VA orthopedic examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's joint pains are attributed to known clinical diagnoses and not due to an undiagnosed illness. Service connection for the claimed disability is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's sleep apnea was rated at 50 percent since October 1, 2005.,For the cervical spine disability, a rating in excess of 30 percent is not warranted. The Veteran has forward flexion limited to 20 degrees and lateral flexion limited to 15 degrees on each side.,The lumbar spondylosis with degenerative joint disease was rated at 10 percent prior to August 3, 2006; a rating in excess of 20 percent is not warranted from that date onwards. The Veteran's range of motion has been limited due to pain on motion.,Right shoulder tendonitis was rated at 10 percent prior to November 1, 2007 and thereafter. The Veteran had right arm range of motion restricted to shoulder level due to pain on motion.,Left wrist tendonitis (residual of a left wrist injury) is service connected.,No residuals of the left foot injury are service connected.,Erectile dysfunction was service connected, but no compensable rating is warranted.,Varicocelectomy is not service connected.,Right index finger fracture and left index finger fracture were not service connected.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, a bilateral shoulder disability, neuropathy of the upper extremities, and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities. The decision also addressed his claim for increased ratings for his service-connected degenerative changes of the lumbar spine and cervical spine arthritis, as well as his TDIU request.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including an ovarian cyst, a right foot disorder (claimed as fracture), a right shoulder disorder, recurrent otitis media, and a right ankle disorder (claimed as sprain).
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's increased rating claims for degenerative arthritis of the lumbar, dorsal, and cervical spines. The claim to reopen service connection for a left shoulder disability was also denied due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed lumbar spine, left shoulder, and right hand disabilities are not service-connected. The psychiatric disability is also denied as there is no evidence of a current diagnosis or link to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete VA examination reports and the Veteran's request for a travel board hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's currently diagnosed left shoulder rotator cuff tear is not related to his service-connected left shoulder pectoral scar or military service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2010
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn due to the appellant's request for withdrawal prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for further development of his reserve component records and additional clinical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his right shoulder disability were denied as the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.