Shoulder Board decisions
55,939 indexed Board decisions for Shoulder.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board denied a higher rating for the veteran's post-operative left shoulder disability and did not address his claim for TDIU due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2000
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected left shoulder disability is being remanded to the RO for further development, including scheduling a VA examination and obtaining additional medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for right shoulder, left ankle, and right ankle disorders due to a lack of competent medical evidence linking these conditions to his period of active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy, soft tissue sarcoma, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, degenerative joint disease of both hips, disability of both shoulders, and neck disability are not well-grounded. The Board has denied these claims previously.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for left shoulder and wrist disorders are not well-grounded, as there is no evidence of a chronic disability resulting from service. The claim will be denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The Board granted an increased rating for bursitis of the right shoulder with right shoulder pain from 30 percent to 40 percent effective February 1, 1995. The attorney is eligible for payment of 20% of past-due benefits awarded due to this decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a left leg disorder and ulnar nerve compression, finding no medical evidence establishing a nexus between these conditions and his military service. The increased rating claim for shoulder disability was also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for PTSD due to submission of new and material evidence. The claims for other conditions remain not well grounded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2000
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including examinations and consideration of applicable court precedents and regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, arteriosclerotic heart disease, and arthritis of the left shoulder are not well grounded. The evidence does not show a chronic condition in service or within one year after separation from service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board found that the veteran's claim for service connection for arthritis, right shoulder, as secondary to his service-connected reconstructive surgery, right shoulder, is not well-grounded.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for right shoulder, left shoulder, right elbow, right knee, and right hand disorders are not well grounded. The evidence does not establish a nexus between these current disabilities and any inservice disease or injury.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The veteran's right shoulder and arm conditions are rated at the maximum available rating, with no additional benefits for adaptive equipment.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board denied increased ratings for the veteran's service-connected gunshot wound to Muscle Groups III and IV of the left shoulder, shell fragment wounds to the left temple and right upper arm. The veteran was not granted any compensable evaluations.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board found no well-grounded claims for service connection of the claimed conditions as they are not related to active military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The Board has granted a 50 percent rating for the service-connected left shoulder arthrodesis and has denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The veteran's claim for PTSD is granted as it was incurred in service. The claim for arthritis of the back, shoulders, neck, and legs is not well-grounded due to lack of competent medical evidence linking the condition to service or any incident during service. The claim for an evaluation in excess of 50 percent for muscular atrophy is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The Board has granted a rating of 30 percent for the veteran's service-connected residuals of a torn rotator cuff, left shoulder, with limitation of motion and traumatic arthritis. The claim for an increased rating for postoperative residuals of a Baker's cyst, left knee, remains unresolved.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The Board has granted the appellant's claims for service connection for restrictive lung disease, cervical spine disorder (including degenerative joint disease of the cervical spine and cervical radiculopathy), and chronic fatigue syndrome. The right shoulder disorder is not considered well-grounded due to lack of evidence. Dizziness was also found to be related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board found that the veteran's claims for service connection were not well-grounded, as there was no diagnosed right shoulder or right eye disability and insufficient medical evidence linking current heart palpitations to service. The claim for right testicular pain was considered based on a history of post-service complications from a 1994 vasectomy.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.