Sinusitis decisions — 2017
452 indexed Board decisions in 2017.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2017
The Veteran's appeal for the issue of whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for sinusitis was withdrawn during his November 2015 Board hearing. The case is being remanded for further development regarding the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for sleep apnea.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2017
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to obtain outstanding VA treatment records and to schedule the Veteran for examinations to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed conditions. The appeal will be remanded to allow for this development.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's lung disability, including linear atelectasis of right lung base, and obstructive sleep apnea are related to his military service and his service-connected allergic rhinitis and recurrent sinusitis, status post nasal fracture and septoplasty. The decision is in favor of granting service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2017
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a new VA examination and the need to obtain additional treatment records.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2017
The Veteran's service-connected sinusitis is manifested by at least two incapacitating episodes and more than six non-incapacitating episodes per year, with constant headaches, pain, and crusting or discharges. The Board finds that the evidence as a whole indicates these symptoms warrant a 50 percent rating for the entire appeal period.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's right ear disorders, including hearing loss, were not related to his period of active service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2017
The Board has remanded the TDIU claim due to inadequate VA examination opinions regarding the Veteran's employability. The case is now pending for further development and an appropriate opinion from a vocational expert.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2017
The Board has remanded the TDIU claim due to its inextricability with other claims, and the Veteran's increased rating claims for sinusitis and PTSD have not yet been adjudicated. The case is REMANDED for further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2017
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete medical opinions regarding the Veteran's claimed conditions and their relationship to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's sleep apnea is a result of his service-connected chronic sinusitis, and thus grants the claim for secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's sleep apnea did not have its onset during service and is not otherwise related to active service or caused by his service-connected sinusitis. Therefore, the claim for service connection was denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2017
The Veteran's low back disorder is not related to service, but her sinusitis and associated headaches are related to service.,Service connection for a low back disorder is denied. Service connection for sinusitis with associated sinus headaches is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2017
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prior to September 17, 2007 did not meet the schedular requirements for a TDIU. The claim is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2017
The Veteran's patellofemoral syndrome of the right knee is not related to his service, as it was a self-limiting condition. The Board finds that he does not have current sinusitis and thus cannot establish service connection for this issue.,The Veteran has been diagnosed with venous stasis dermatitis of the lower extremities (formerly tinea cruris) which is currently present. However, his in-service rash was resolved.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2017
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities are shown to be of such severity so as to preclude substantially gainful employment consistent with his education and experience, effective October 16, 2013.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2017
The Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation prior to November 26, 2012 and an increased rating in excess of 30 percent thereafter for chronic maxillary sinusitis was denied. The effective date remains at the date of receipt of his claim on May 22, 2009.,The Veteran's TDIU claim is pending as it requires additional development.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), a right ankle disability, residuals of low back injury, right lower extremity sciatica, sinusitis, rhinitis, IBS, and GERD. The decision also addressed reopening of his claim for service connection for asbestos exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's sinusitis did not manifest in service and is not related to his military service, including any exposure to herbicide agents. Therefore, service connection for sinusitis was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2017
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for rhinitis and sinusitis, as well as his claim for service connection for a lumbar spine disability, require additional development before they can be adjudicated on the merits. The case is REMANDED for further action.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's nasal disability, including sinusitis, deviated septum, and non-allergic rhinitis, was incurred or aggravated in active duty service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.