Skin cancer Board decisions
5,619 indexed Board decisions for Skin cancer.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The veteran's claims for service connection for bladder cancer and skin cancer, including as due to exposure to ionizing radiation in service, were denied. The RO found no evidence of the veteran being within ten miles of Hiroshima or Nagasaki during his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for skin melanoma, which he claimed as multiple myeloma due to exposure to Agent Orange. The evidence did not support a finding that his current condition was related to service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2004
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and squamous cell skin cancer are not service-connected. The evidence does not show these conditions were present during or within one year after service, nor is there any competent medical evidence linking them to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further development to obtain records of possible toxin exposure during active duty service and to obtain medical opinions regarding whether such exposure caused or contributed to the veteran's claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including verification of exposure to herbicides and pesticides in service, and a medical opinion on the relationship between the veteran's death and his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2004
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD, linking the current diagnosis to a verified in-service stressor. The skin condition claim is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability or causation related to service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2004
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional treatment records from a VA outpatient clinic in Ft. Myers, Florida.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2004
The VA determined that the veteran's skin condition is not related to service or herbicide exposure, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for his service-connected melanoma, finding that the earliest effective date allowed by law is June 28, 1984.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2004
The Board has received notification from the appellant that they wish to withdraw their appeal. As a result, the appeal is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2004
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims due to incomplete records and the need for additional medical opinions regarding his skin cancer.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2004
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss, but denied service connection for a skin disorder including squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. The veteran's hearing loss is presumed to be due to noise exposure during active duty service. However, there is no credible evidence linking the skin disorders to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2004
The Board found that the veteran does not have nicotine dependence, hypertension, or skin cancer that is attributable to his military service. The VA examiner determined that these conditions are more likely due to post-service tobacco use and smoking habits.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for migraine headaches, skin cancer, and a psychiatric disability (PTSD). The veteran does not have migraine headaches. For skin cancer, there is no evidence of current disability or previous removal. For PTSD, the veteran has depression but no diagnosis of PTSD.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2004
The Board has reopened the veteran's claims for service connection for a right knee disorder, to include traumatic geniculate neuroma, and granted service connection based on direct evidence of an in-service injury. The veteran's current right knee disorder is found to be related to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2004
The Board found that the veteran's current skin disorder, including skin cancer and basal cell carcinoma, was not incurred in service. The claim is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including arthritis, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and skin cancer. The decision also noted that new evidence had been submitted to reopen a claim of service connection for osteoarthritis with disc disease of the dorsocervical spine.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2004
The veteran requested to withdraw his appeal, which the Board accepted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for superficial spreading malignant melanoma with resultant muscle damage is being remanded to the AOJ for further evaluation, including consideration of impairment in affected muscles.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2004
The veteran's claims for service connection for skin cancer of the nose and face, thyroid cancer, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease were denied. The Board found that these conditions did not have their onset during active duty or for many years thereafter, were not disabling to a compensable degree during the first post-service year, and are not etiologically related to service-connected disabilities.
← Back to Skin cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.