Skin cancer Board decisions
5,619 indexed Board decisions for Skin cancer.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2003
The Board has remanded the case for further development and consideration of the veteran's claims, including applying the revised rating criteria for skin disorders. The case will be returned to the agency of original jurisdiction for readjudication.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2003
The veteran has been granted service connection for the residuals of a cold injury of his hands. The Board found that there was evidence of extreme cold exposure in service, and the VA examinations supported this finding.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for ear, nose, and skin conditions, all of which were claimed as resulting from radiation exposure during active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for skin cancer, finding no evidence linking his current condition to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for multiple joint disorders, skin cancer, insomnia, fatigue, and memory loss. The reasons were not provided in the given text.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to pending issues regarding service connection for various conditions. The case is now remanded for additional examinations and consideration.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2003
The veteran's appeal for service connection for skin cancer is being remanded due to the need for additional development of his claim.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJuly 2003
The Board found that the new evidence submitted by the veteran was cumulative and did not address the bases for the original denial of his claim. The decision is mixed as some issues were granted, but the overall outcome is denied due to lack of new material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2003
The Board found that the veteran's cause of death, metastatic melanoma to the thalamus, was not service-connected and denied the claim for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1318.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2003
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for skin cancer, which he claimed was due to exposure to radiation. The case is being remanded for additional development and compliance with VCAA requirements.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran is not entitled to service connection for carpal tunnel syndrome, left shoulder disorder, neck disorder, right ankle disorder, low back strain, traumatic arthritis of the left knee, postoperative residuals of reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligaments of the left ankle with traumatic arthritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), or hypertension. The veteran's service-connected disabilities are already in effect for his left knee and left ankle disorders.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2003
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death and eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance under chapter 35 due to lack of evidence linking the conditions to military service or exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2003
The Board found that the veteran's malignant melanoma of his left leg was not incurred in or aggravated by active service, nor may this disease be presumed to have been incurred in active service. The claim for service connection was denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's malignant melanoma, which caused his death in January 1999, was incurred during his military service and is therefore service-connected. The appellant also meets the requirements for basic eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA).
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2003
The Board found that the metastatic melanoma which caused the veteran's death was not incurred in or aggravated by service, and may not be presumed to have been otherwise incurred in service.,The basic eligibility requirements for entitlement to Dependents' Educational Assistance allowance under Chapter 35 were not met.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's multiple skin cancers are likely related to his military service, and thus grants service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2003
The Board is remanding the case for further development to determine if the veteran's skin cancer and pancreatic cancer were related to his service, specifically exposure to extreme heat and sunlight in North Africa. The VA will also review the records from the Dallas VAMC regarding any treatment provided to the veteran in 1982.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2003
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for arthritis of the ankles, knees, hips, elbows, and shoulders, as well as skin cancer and peripheral neuropathy, all claimed as residuals of a cold injury. The right great toe disability was granted service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2003
The Board denied service connection for various conditions, including ichthyosis, skin cancer, fracture of the navicular bone of the left foot, nerve damage to the left leg and arm, slurred speech and disorientation, psychiatric disorder (dementia), and multiple trauma. The veteran's claims were not supported by competent medical evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2003
The veteran's skin cancers are determined to be of service origin and he is granted service connection for these conditions.
← Back to Skin cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.