Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
25,566 vetted Board decisions for Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis).
The Board granted service connection for acne vulgaris, but denied claims for peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities and carpal tunnel syndrome.
The Board denied initial compensable ratings for bilateral tinea pedis and headaches, granted a 10 percent rating for bilateral pes planus, and assigned a 70 percent rating for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The appeal is remanded for additional development and a VA medical opinion to address the etiology of the veteran's claimed disabilities.
The veteran's service-connected eczema and pseudofolliculitis barbae are rated at 10 percent, which is the maximum rating available under the applicable criteria. The claims for service connection for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and sinusitis and pharyngitis were denied as there was no current medical diagnosis of these conditions.
The veteran was granted service connection for diabetes mellitus as due to exposure to herbicides, and an earlier effective date of October 18, 1983, for the grant of service connection for sickle cell disease.
The veteran withdrew his appeal for a higher initial evaluation of seborrhea dermatitis, and the appeal was dismissed.
The veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for various disabilities were denied, as the evidence did not support ratings in excess of those currently assigned.
The Board remands the claims for service connection to the RO for further development and readjudication.
The veteran's current tinea cruris is etiologically related to his active service.
The Board denied service connection for chloracne as there is no credible evidence that the condition became manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more within one year of the veteran's last day of service in Vietnam.
The Board denied the veteran's petitions to reopen claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, but restored a 30 percent rating for atopic dermatitis from September 1, 2006, to September 29, 2006. The reduction of the rating was ultimately upheld as of September 30, 2006.
The veteran is unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected disabilities, which are currently assigned a combined rating of 90 percent.
The Board denied service connection for chloracne as there is no persuasive evidence suggesting the veteran has chloracne that either originated in service or is otherwise causally related to his military service, including exposure to herbicides such as Agent Orange.
The veteran withdrew the appeal before the Board promulgated a decision.
The case must be remanded for additional development, including a VA examination and RO consideration of all applicable criteria.
The veteran's skin disability, tinea pedis of bilateral feet and onychomycosis of bilateral hands and feet, does not warrant a rating in excess of 30 percent.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection of frostbite, syphilis, rheumatoid arthritis, lumbar and cervical spine disabilities, tinea pedis, and tinea cruris as there is no competent evidence to support a finding that these conditions are related to his military service.
The Board denied the claims for service connection for Raynaud's syndrome, an increased rating for Sjogren's syndrome, and a total disability rating based on individual unemployability.
The veteran's claims for service connection for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and an increased evaluation for atopic dermatitis were remanded for additional development, including obtaining a new VA examination.
The Board determined that new and material evidence had been received to reopen the chloracne claim, but denied service connection for a skin disorder characterized as chloracne. The tinnitus claim was remanded.
← Back to Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.