Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
25,566 vetted Board decisions for Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis).
The veteran's skin disorder affecting the face, head, and neck is rated as 10 percent disabling under Diagnostic Code 7806-7800.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected left wrist disability, finding that the schedular criteria for an evaluation in excess of 20 percent had not been met.
The Board has denied the appellant's claims for service connection for psychiatric, skin, and pulmonary disorders, as well as a condition on the buttocks. The reasons are not provided in this text.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased evaluation for bilateral hearing loss and service connection for dermatitis. The veteran was not granted any of his requested benefits.
The veteran's low back strain with degenerative changes is currently rated at 20 percent, but the Board finds no basis for a higher evaluation.,The veteran's bilateral lattice degeneration with asymptomatic retinal holes is currently rated at 20 percent, and the Board finds no basis for a higher evaluation.,The veteran's cystic acne is currently rated at 10 percent. The Board finds no basis for a higher evaluation.
The veteran's appeal is denied as his service-connected conditions do not warrant a higher evaluation.
The Board has determined that there is no new and material evidence to reopen the veteran's claims for service connection for pseudofolliculitis barbae, a back disorder, and pes planus. The previous denials of these claims are considered final.
The veteran's skin disability, including chloracne and tinea pedis, is being remanded for further development as the service records are incomplete and additional medical evidence may be needed to determine if these conditions are related to his military service or exposure to Agent Orange.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a 30 percent rating for his skin disability, finding that it was not factually ascertainable that an increase in severity had occurred within one year prior to September 28, 1994.
The VA has granted service connection for scalp dermatitis and assigned a 10 percent evaluation, but the appellant is seeking a higher rating.
The veteran's service-connected eczema of the hands and feet has chronically worsened his dysthymic disorder, warranting service connection for a dysthymic disorder on a secondary basis.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for tinea pedis, residuals of a left foot injury, and callosities of both feet with claw toe of the left second toe. The evidence did not support higher ratings under the applicable diagnostic codes.
The Board has determined that the veteran's tinea versicolor warrants a 50 percent evaluation, the highest available under Diagnostic Code 7806.
The VA has denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for seborrheic dermatitis of the nose and chest, and residuals of trench feet. The skin condition is rated as 10 percent disabling, while the foot disability remains noncompensable.
The VA has denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for perifolliculitis capitis with keloid formation, currently rated at 10 percent.
The Board has determined that the current disability ratings for left cubital tunnel syndrome with left medial epicondylitis, osteoarthritis of the thoracic spine, and pseudofolliculitis barbae are appropriate.
The Board has granted an initial rating of 30 percent for the veteran's nonspecific dermatitis of the right foot, effective from September 16, 1998.
The Board found that the veteran's hearing loss did not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation under either the old or new VA rating schedules. The claims of service connection for other conditions were denied as they were not well-grounded.
The Board has determined that the veteran's dyshidrosis with tinea pedis warrants a rating of at least 30 percent. The case is remanded for further development and consideration.
The Board denied the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for arthritis secondary to his service-connected psoriasis, finding that there was no evidence of a causal relationship between his psoriasis and any arthritis.
← Back to Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.