Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis) Board decisions
25,566 indexed Board decisions for Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's squamous cell carcinoma was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and may not be presumed to have been so incurred or aggravated. The claim for acne is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability, recurrence within one year after discharge, or association with service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's dermatitis, lower extremity, representative of stasis dermatitis exacerbated by lichenified simplex chronicus, is currently rated at 60 percent and does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation. The Veteran's service-connected disability has not prevented him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's skin rash and chloracne were not found to be related to service. The VA denied the claims for higher ratings for peripheral neuropathy of both upper extremities, as well as for bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection, finding no compensable hearing loss or significant impairment from his diagnosed conditions. The Veteran's appeals were dismissed due to withdrawal of his appeal regarding the left hand rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to address the Veteran's claims, including providing VCAA notice and obtaining medical opinions regarding service connection for various conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim of service connection for a skin disorder and granted it, finding that new evidence supports a link between his current condition and military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the Veteran's service connection claims for asthmatic bronchitis, acne, and depression. The claims are being remanded to obtain missing STRs and to schedule VA examinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's dermatitis was rated as noncompensable prior to April 3, 2014. Since then, the condition has been manifested by intermittent systemic therapy such as corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs required for a total duration of less than six weeks during any 12-month period.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's tinea versicolor and tinea pedis with onychomycosis of the right great toe are currently rated at 30 percent, which is the maximum schedular rating available for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development due to new evidence submitted after the RO's latest Supplemental Statement of the Case.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn by the appellant prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for migraine headaches, chronic gynecological disability (pelvic pain and abnormal menses), acne, and chronic fatigue syndrome. The evidence is at least in equipoise as to whether these conditions are related to her active service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Board has granted service connection for Pseudofolliculitis barbae (PFB) and PTSD, but denied service connection for low back strain, left knee disability, right knee disability, and hypertension. The Veteran's current diagnoses of PTSD are related to his wartime experiences.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's hypertension, atrial tachycardia, and chronic lumbar strain are rated at the maximum allowable under VA regulations. The other conditions have been evaluated as noncompensable or with a 10% rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's appeal was withdrawn for the issue of service connection for asbestosis. The Board found that a compensable disability rating (10%) is warranted for his right forehead scar, but denied entitlement to higher ratings for PTSD and other conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and considering lay statements regarding the Veteran's skin conditions during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for tinea versicolor, finding that his condition did not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on body coverage or systemic therapy. The appeal was also denied regarding service connection for sleep apnea and back disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Board has granted service connection for psoriasis and vertigo, as well as restored the 50 percent disability rating for bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The Veteran's symptoms of psoriasis and vertigo were initially manifested during service and have continued since then.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's pseudofolliculitis barbae and seborrheic dermatitis have been rated at 10 percent since the appeal began, reflecting their current severity.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected superficial acne and pseudofolliculitis barbae (PFB) is being remanded due to the need for updated treatment records and a contemporaneous examination.
← Back to Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.