Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis) Board decisions
25,566 indexed Board decisions for Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, a skin disability including chloracne and acne vulgaris, and a low back disability. The evidence did not establish that any of these conditions were incurred or aggravated by military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2014
The Board has ordered a remand for further development, including scheduling the Veteran for a VA examination and obtaining additional medical records. The claim will be reconsidered after these actions.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2014
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed as the appellant withdrew her substantive appeal prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed left hip, left knee, and thoracolumbar spine disabilities did not manifest during service or within one year of discharge. The current evidence does not support a finding that these conditions are related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Veteran's claims for initial compensable ratings for bilateral hearing loss and eczematous dermatitis were denied as the evidence did not show that his conditions warranted a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Veteran's service-connected right shoulder strain, dry eye syndrome, and contact dermatitis have not been shown to warrant a higher initial disability rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed conditions are not service-connected as they were not incurred or aggravated during his active military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2014
The Board has granted service connection for pseudofolliculitis barbae and determined that the Veteran's current condition is related to his active military service. The NSC pension claim will be remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2014
The Veteran's skin disability, seborrheic dermatitis, is being remanded for a new VA examination due to the Veteran's testimony of worsening symptoms.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Veteran's claims for compensation under 1151 and secondary service connection were denied as there was no evidence of VA negligence or fault in the care provided, and his conditions are not considered to be proximately due to or the result of a condition that has been previously established.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2014
Service connection for peripheral neuropathy and chloracne has been established based on the presumption of exposure to herbicides during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for external otitis, bilateral hearing loss, tinea versicolor, and recurrent tinnitus. The claims were not reopened due to lack of new and material evidence, and the tinnitus claim was denied as there is no competent medical evidence linking it to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The VA denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a skin disability, finding that his condition is not related to his military service and ruling out exposure to herbicides as a cause. The examiner concluded that eczema and rosacea are not likely related to his time in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including migraine headaches and skin disorders. The decision did not address whether any of these conditions were related to his military service or exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2014
The Veteran is seeking an initial compensable rating for nummular eczema from August 7, 2006, and a higher rating of at least 60 percent since April 26, 2012. The case has been remanded to obtain additional medical records and to provide the Veteran with a VA dermatologist's opinion regarding whether his use of topical Triamcinolone should be considered systemic therapy.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2014
The Veteran's dermatitis of the right hand is found to be due to service, and he is granted service connection for this condition. The Board finds that there is not enough evidence to establish a direct link between his current hearing loss disability or heart disorder (Wolfe-Parkinson-White syndrome) and his active duty in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's low back disability, respiratory disorder, renal cancer residuals, and skin condition are not service-connected.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2014
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for eczema and granted it, finding that there is sufficient evidence to establish a nexus between the Veteran's current eczema and his military service.,Regarding folliculitis, the issue remains pending as new and material evidence has not been received. The Board found this issue 'unknown' because the appeal is not about service connection at all.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2014
The Veteran's appeal for restoration of a 20 percent rating for bilateral hearing loss is dismissed as the claim has been granted. The claim for a 10 percent disability rating for multiple noncompensable service-connected disabilities under 38 C.F.R. § 3.324 is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2014
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records from May 7, 1969 - December 31, 1969 and providing a supplemental opinion based on these records.
← Back to Skin conditions (dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.