Traumatic brain injury (TBI) decisions — 2005
96 indexed Board decisions in 2005.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2005
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete compliance with a previous remand order.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings for his frostbite residuals of both ears, as well as his bilateral knee disability. The veteran was not granted service connection for Dupuytren's contracture of the hands or a bilateral knee disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2005
The Board has granted the veteran's petition to reopen his claim for service connection for the residuals of frostbite to the hands and feet, finding that new evidence received since the March 1975 denial relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of frostbite of a left toe and an increase in his rating for low back disability. The veteran does not have current residuals of frostbite of a left toe, and there is no evidence to support a grant of service connection for this condition. For his low back disability, the Board found that the preponderance of the evidence was against a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of a hernia and residuals of frostbite of the feet are denied as there is no competent medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2005
The veteran's frostbite residuals have been granted a 10% evaluation, effective from August 30, 2002.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus and residuals of frostbite, finding that there is no direct evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2005
The Board found that the veteran's claimed conditions were not incurred or aggravated by service, and denied his claims for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of frostbite and tinnitus, as well as his claim for an increased rating for PTSD. The evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were incurred or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2005
The veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The RO granted service connection for residuals of cold injuries to the feet, but did not grant an evaluation in excess of 10 percent prior to January 12, 1998 or in excess of 20 percent from that date.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2005
The Board found no evidence of a service-connected frostbite or cold injury, and thus denied the veteran's claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2005
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a supplemental opinion regarding whether his service-connected disabilities render him unemployable, independent of other conditions not related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of frostbite and diabetes mellitus, finding no evidence to support these claims. The veteran's current disabilities are not shown to be related to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2005
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of frostbite injuries to the veteran's feet during service, and the preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that any current foot disabilities are related to such in-service injury. As a result, service connection for residuals of frostbite of both feet is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2005
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the nature and etiology of any residuals of a head injury, left clavicle fracture, frostbite of hands and feet, right or left little finger injury, and back pain/spine condition. The veteran's medical records from Dr. J. A. Nilsen should also be obtained.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claim of service connection for frostbite of the feet and his claim for a psychiatric disorder, including PTSD and anxiety disorder. The denial is based on lack of evidence showing such conditions were incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2005
The Board found no evidence of a current disability for any of the conditions and concluded that service connection was not warranted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2005
The Board found that the veteran's currently diagnosed psychiatric disorders are not related to events in service and denied all claims for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including left long thoracic nerve neurapraxia, low back disorder, neurological condition with headaches, dizziness and light-headedness, shortening of the left lower extremity, first degree AV block, respiratory disorder, hearing loss, skin condition of the hands and feet (claimed as a foot disorder due to frostbite), facial lacerations, nasal fracture, teeth numbers 8 and 9 for VA dental treatment, and jaw disability. The claims were found not to have been incurred in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2005
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to provide VCAA notice and for a new compensation examination.
← Back to Traumatic brain injury (TBI) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.