Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
1,197 vetted Board decisions in 2005.
The veteran requested an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for tinnitus, which was denied by the RO. The Board found that no earlier effective date could be granted as the claim was not filed within one year after separation from service.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, an allergy disorder, and a sinus disorder. The claim for an undiagnosed illness due to neurotoxin exposure was also denied as the veteran did not serve during the Persian Gulf War.
The Board denied the veteran's request for an effective date prior to June 10, 1999, for a grant of a compensable evaluation for tinnitus. The claim was granted on VA initiative in August 2000 and assigned a separate 10% evaluation with an effective date of April 28, 2000.
The Board found that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of agoraphobia or tinnitus, and service connection was denied as there is no direct evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
The case is being remanded for additional development of the appellant's medical records and Social Security Administration (SSA) disability benefits claim.
The Board found that the veteran's claimed conditions, including bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, headaches, fatigue, left ankle disorder, and cervical spine disorder, were not incurred or aggravated by his active duty military service.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for further development and consideration of his claims, including providing VCAA notice as required.
The veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance or due to housebound status is denied as he does not meet the criteria for either benefit.
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected tinnitus has been denied as the maximum schedular rating of 10 percent is already in effect.
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation in excess of 10 percent for service-connected tinnitus has been denied as the maximum schedular rating is already assigned.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an initial compensable rating for hearing loss in the left ear, service connection for hearing loss in the right ear, and service connection for bilateral tinnitus. The April 2003 VA audiological evaluation showed that the veteran had a noncompensable level of hearing acuity in both ears.
The veteran's claim for separate 10 percent disability evaluations for each ear pursuant to the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 4.87, Diagnostic Code 6260 (2004) for his bilateral tinnitus has been denied as a matter of law due to the regulations prohibiting such separate ratings.
The Board has denied the appellant's claim for separate compensable evaluations for service-connected bilateral tinnitus as there is no basis under current VA regulations and criteria to assign such ratings.
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus due to a lack of notification regarding a scheduled VA examination.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, an abnormal EKG, loss of right eye vision, fibromyalgia, circulatory dysfunction of the lower extremities, loss of teeth, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus. The reasons were that there was no diagnosis of PTSD, no credible supporting evidence for the occurrence of in-service stressors, no chronic disease associated with an abnormal EKG, no causal relationship between herbicide exposure and the claimed conditions, and no service connection could be established.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, residuals of a stroke, and TDIU due to lack of evidence supporting these conditions. The veteran was found not to have current disabilities that would warrant service connection.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his bilateral tinnitus and defective hearing, both currently rated at 10 percent.
The Board has determined that the veteran's tinnitus is related to his noise exposure during service, and therefore grants service connection for this condition. The right wrist injury claim is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability or nexus to service.
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of his bilateral hearing loss is being remanded due to the need for a more recent VA audiometric examination.
← Back to Tinnitus (ringing in the ears) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.