Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
86,613 indexed Board decisions for Tinnitus (ringing in the ears).
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus due to incomplete information and need for additional medical opinions.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for tinnitus was denied because the evidence did not show that his current tinnitus began during or within one year after his active duty, and is less likely related to in-service noise exposure.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for right knee condition was denied because there was no indication of a disease or injury incurred in service, and the earliest medical records showing symptoms were from over two decades after he left military service.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for tinnitus as there is no current diagnosis of this condition.
The Board has found that the Veteran's tinnitus is related to his in-service noise exposure and granted service connection for this condition.
The Veteran's PTSD is granted as service-connected. The skin condition and tinnitus claims are remanded for further development.
The Board has remanded the claim of entitlement to service connection for tinnitus due to inadequate reasons and bases in the previous decision. The Veteran is required to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for his contentions regarding the adequacy of VA examinations.
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the Veteran's current conditions are at least as likely as not related to his active military service.
The Board has granted service connection for coronary artery disease and Type 2 diabetes mellitus on a presumptive basis due to herbicide exposure, but denied service connection for tinnitus. The Veteran's hypertension is remanded for further development.,Service connection for hypertension secondary to diabetes mellitus is also remanded.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus due to incomplete VA treatment records. The Veteran will be asked to provide additional audiogram results, and a new examination will be scheduled if necessary.
The Veteran's lumbar spine disability was granted an increased rating of 40 percent effective August 14, 2015.,An initial compensable rating for tinnitus is denied. The maximum schedular evaluation (10%) has been assigned.
The Veteran's claim for TDIU was denied as his service-connected disabilities did not render him unemployable. The Board found that the Veteran's unemployment is due to non-service connected disabilities, such as low back and bilateral hip pain.
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for lumbar radiculopathy of the right lower extremity was denied, and his TDIU claim was granted.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to outstanding VA and private treatment records, as well as clarification of SSA disability benefits.
The Veteran's claims for bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and bilateral tinnitus have been denied as there is no evidence of chronic in-service symptoms or continuous post-service symptoms, and the current conditions are not etiologically related to service.
The Veteran's low back disability, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, hypertension, and type II diabetes mellitus were not shown as chronic in service or within the applicable presumptive period. The Board found no evidence of continuity of symptomatology for any condition.,While the Veteran reported having hearing difficulties, there is no audiometric evidence showing that he had a bilateral hearing loss disability considered a VA disability for which service connection could be granted.,The Veteran's tinnitus was not shown as chronic in service or within the applicable presumptive period. The Board found no evidence of continuity of symptomatology for this condition.,Hypertension was not shown as chronic in service, and there is no clinical evidence suggesting that it manifested to a compensable degree within the applicable presumptive period. The Board also found no evidence of continuity of symptomatology for hypertension.,Type II diabetes mellitus was not shown as chronic in service or within the applicable presumptive period. The Board found no evidence of continuity of symptomatology for this condition.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus. The claims are remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding the onset of these conditions during service.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for high blood pressure, acquired psychiatric disorder (unspecified depressive disorder), tinnitus, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus due to inextricably intertwined issues.
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the Veteran's MOS likely exposed him to noise during service, leading to current hearing loss and tinnitus. The decision is based on the Veteran's lay statements of continuous symptoms since separation from service.
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss, finding that the Veteran's current hearing loss is at least as likely as not related to his active duty service. However, the Board denied service connection for tinnitus, concluding that there is no evidence of a current diagnosis or in-service injury leading to the condition.
The Veteran is seeking an earlier effective date for service connection of tinnitus, which was denied in a February 1973 rating decision. The appeal includes a claim that the February 1973 decision had CUE.
← Back to Tinnitus (ringing in the ears) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.